Re: Preparing for XPointer

["Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, 2001-10-24 at 14:18, Mark Baker wrote:
> During that thought experiment, it occurred to me that we should
> be watching +xml registrations to ensure that, where possible,
> "#foo" syntax is reserved for identifying fragments labelled with
> an ID (or http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#id) type attribute of
> value "foo".
> 
> This would ensure that XPointer could be be retrofitted into
> 3023 later and apply to all */xml and */*+xml types.

It seems like a reasonable idea.  In some ways, #foo is pretty much
MinPointer, the one part of XPointer about which I hear no complaints.

-- 
Simon St.Laurent
"Every day, in every way, I'm getting better and better." - Emile Coue