[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Request for review of EmotionML media type: application/emotionml+xml

* Kazuyuki Ashimura wrote:
>W3C has just published a Candidate Recommendation for "Emotion Markup
>Language (EmotionML)" at:
>  http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/CR-emotionml-20120510/
>I am sending this request to ask the Ietf-types list for comments on
>the Media Type section of the EmotionML specification following the
>procedure defined at:
>  http://www.w3.org/2002/06/registering-mediatype

The procedure requires Working Groups to ask for ietf-types review when
making a Last Call announcement. I have not been able to find any such
request in the archive. If the Working Group failed to follow the pro-
cedure, it would be helpful if you could put that on the record.

>MIME media type name:
>     application

This is using an outdated template. The current one is in RFC 4288. In
it, some field names are different and some fields are organized in a
different manner.

>Optional parameters:
>     charset
>         This parameter has identical semantics to the charset parameter 
>of the application/xml media type as specified in [RFC3023] or its 
>Encoding considerations:
>     By virtue of EmotionML content being XML, it has the same 
>considerations when sent as "application/emotionml+xml" as does XML. See 
>RFC 3023 (or its successor), section 3.2.

RFC 3023 has boilerplate for this, but the above seems close enough.
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@xxxxxxxxxxxx · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/