Archive of ietf-xml-mime, by thread

• Re: Requiring charset parameter on +xml types?, (continued)
  • Re: Requiring charset parameter on +xml types?, muraw3c
    • Re: Requiring charset parameter on +xml types?, Rick Jelliffe
• Re:, Paul Grosso
  • Re:, Eve L. Maler
    • MIME-XML technology?, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: MIME-XML technology?, Philipp Hoschka
      • Re: MIME-XML technology?, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: MIME-XML technology?, Eve L. Maler
• [no subject], Lloyd Rutledge
  • Re:, Chris Lilley
    • Re:, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re:, Chris Lilley
      • Re:, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re:, Chris Lilley
    • Re: Conformance value of "+xml"? (was empty, or "[symm]"), Lloyd Rutledge
      • Re: Conformance value of "+xml"? (was empty, or "[symm]"), Chris Lilley
      • Re: Conformance value of "+xml"? (was empty, or "[symm]"), Simon St.Laurent
• Conformance value of "+xml"?, Mark Baker
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Conformance value of "+xml"?, Dan Kohn
    • Re: Conformance value of "+xml"?, Mark Baker
    • Re: Conformance value of "+xml"?, Chris Lilley
      • Re: Conformance value of "+xml"?, Martin J. Duerst
      • Re: Conformance value of "+xml"?, Mark Baker
      • Re: Conformance value of "+xml"?, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Conformance value of "+xml"?, Chris Lilley
      • Re: Conformance value of "+xml"?, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Conformance value of "+xml"?, Tim Bray
      • Re: Conformance value of "+xml"?, Mark Baker
      • Re: Conformance value of "+xml"?, muraw3c
      • XPointer scheme names (was Re: Conformance value of "+xml"?), Eve L. Maler
      • Re: XPointer scheme names (was Re: Conformance value of "+xml"?), Martin J. Duerst
• draft-ietf-roamops-phonebook-xml-05.txt, Dan Kohn
  • Re: draft-ietf-roamops-phonebook-xml-05.txt, pcalhoun@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • RE: draft-ietf-roamops-phonebook-xml-05.txt, Glen Zorn
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: draft-ietf-roamops-phonebook-xml-05.txt, Dan Kohn
• Fwd: Last Call: XML Media Types to Proposed Standard, MURATA Makoto
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Fwd: Last Call: XML Media Types to Proposed Standard, Paul Grosso
  • RE: Fwd: Last Call: XML Media Types to Proposed Standard, Dan Kohn
    • RE: Fwd: Last Call: XML Media Types to Proposed Standard, Larry Masinter
      • RE: Fwd: Last Call: XML Media Types to Proposed Standard, Dave Peterson
      • RE: Fwd: Last Call: XML Media Types to Proposed Standard, muraw3c
      • RE: Fwd: Last Call: XML Media Types to Proposed Standard, ned . freed
      • RE: Fwd: Last Call: XML Media Types to Proposed Standard, muraw3c
      • RE: Fwd: Last Call: XML Media Types to Proposed Standard, muraw3c
  • RE: Fwd: Last Call: XML Media Types to Proposed Standard, Dan Kohn
• laser printer toner cartridges, bps
• Informal last call: Announcement of draft-murata-xml-06.txt, muraw3c
  • Re: Informal last call: Announcement of draft-murata-xml-06.txt, John Cowan
    • Re: Informal last call: Announcement of draft-murata-xml-06.txt, muraw3c
  • Re: Informal last call: Announcement of draft-murata-xml-06.txt, Martin J. Duerst
    • Re: Informal last call: Announcement of draft-murata-xml-06.txt, muraw3c
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Informal last call: Announcement of draft-murata-xml-06.txt, E.L. Willighagen
    • Re: Informal last call: Announcement of draft-murata-xml-06.txt, Simon St.Laurent
• L.A. Kids, YeaNews
• Announcement of draft-murata-xml-05.txt, MURATA Makoto
• ERROR! Someone May Be Ripping You Off!, yourimage
• your imaging supplies, bench3
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • your imaging supplies, bench1
  • your imaging supplies, bench1
• Announcement of yet another I-D for XML media types, muraw3c
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Announcement of yet another I-D for XML media types, jsaiya
• Announcement of a new I-D, muraw3c
  • Re: Announcement of a new I-D, Chris Lilley
    • Re: Announcement of a new I-D, muraw3c
      • Re: Announcement of a new I-D, Dave Peterson
      • Re: Announcement of a new I-D, muraw3c
      • Re: Announcement of a new I-D, Chris Lilley
      • Re: Announcement of a new I-D, Keith Moore
      • Re: Announcement of a new I-D, ned . freed
      • Separator, Mark Baker
      • Re: Announcement of a new I-D, John Cowan
      • Re: Announcement of a new I-D, Rick Jelliffe
  • Re: Announcement of a new I-D, muraw3c
  • Re: Announcement of a new I-D, muraw3c
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Announcement of a new I-D, Miles Sabin
  • Re: Announcement of a new I-D, Tim Bray
• THE INSURANCE PROFESSIONALS, Salus Financial
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • THE INSURANCE PROFESSIONALS, Salus Financial
  • The Insurance Professionals, Salus Financial
• UTF-16, the BOM, and media types, Tim Bray
  • Re: UTF-16, the BOM, and media types, John Cowan
  • Re: UTF-16, the BOM, and media types, Martin J. Duerst
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: UTF-16, the BOM, and media types, Tim Bray
    • Re: UTF-16, the BOM, and media types, Martin J. Duerst
      • Re: UTF-16, the BOM, and media types, MURATA Makoto
      • Re: UTF-16, the BOM, and media types, Martin J. Duerst
• Fwd: Default of the charset parameter, MURATA Makoto
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Fwd: Re: Default of the charset parameter, MURATA Makoto
• Fwd: Determination of encoding/character set, MURATA Makoto
• Fwd: Text/xml vs application/xml, MURATA Makoto
• Meida types and stylesheet linking, MURATA Makoto
  • Re: Meida types and stylesheet linking, Chris Lilley
    • Re: Meida types and stylesheet linking, MURATA Makoto
      • Re: Meida types and stylesheet linking, Chris Lilley
      • Re: Meida types and stylesheet linking, MURATA Makoto
      • Re: Meida types and stylesheet linking, Chris Lilley
• foo/bar and foo/bar-xml, Tim Bray
• Cross classification (WAS: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion), Miles Sabin
• RE: MIME types and content negotiation, Miles Sabin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: MIME types and content negotiation, Miles Sabin
  • RE: MIME types and content negotiation, Miles Sabin
    • Re: MIME types and content negotiation, Chris Lilley
  • RE: MIME types and content negotiation, Graham Klyne
  • Re: MIME types and content negotiation, Tim Bray
• Finishing the XML-tagging discussion, Paul Hoffman / IMC
  • Re: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion, Dan Crevier
  • Re: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion, Simon St.Laurent
    • Re: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion, ned . freed
      • MIME types and content negotiation, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: MIME types and content negotiation, Chris Lilley
      • Re: MIME types and content negotiation, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: MIME types and content negotiation, Chris Lilley
      • Re: MIME types and content negotiation, Keith Moore
      • Re: MIME types and content negotiation, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: MIME types and content negotiation, Graham Klyne
      • Re: MIME types and content negotiation, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: MIME types and content negotiation, ned . freed
      • Re: MIME types and content negotiation, Graham Klyne
      • Re: MIME types and content negotiation, Graham Klyne
      • Re: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion, Paul Hoffman / IMC
      • Re: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion, Paul Hoffman / IMC
      • Re: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion, Elliotte Rusty Harold
      • Re: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion, ned . freed
      • Re: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion, ned . freed
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion, Tim Bray
    • Re: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
  • Re: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion, Tim Bray
    • Re: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion, Simon St.Laurent
  • Re: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion, by way of "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
    • Re: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion, Graham Klyne
      • Re: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion, ned . freed
      • Re: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion, Chris Lilley
      • Re: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion, Keith Moore
      • Re: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion, ned . freed
      • Re: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion, Keith Moore
      • Re: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion, Keith Moore
      • Re: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion, Keith Moore
      • Re: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion, Keith Moore
      • Re: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion, Keith Moore
      • Re: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion, ned . freed
      • Re: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion, Keith Moore
      • Re: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion, Keith Moore
      • Re: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion, Keith Moore
      • Re: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion, ned . freed
      • Re: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion, Keith Moore
      • Re: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion, ned . freed
      • Re: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion, Graham Klyne
      • Re: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion, Keith Moore
      • Re: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion, ned . freed
      • Re: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion, John Cowan
      • Re: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion, Graham Klyne
      • Re: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion, ned . freed
      • Re: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion, ned . freed
      • Re: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion, Martin J. Duerst
      • Re: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion, Keith Moore
      • Re: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion, ned . freed
      • Re: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion, Martin J. Duerst
      • Re: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion, Valdis . Kletnieks
      • Re: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion, ned . freed
      • Re: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion, Keith Moore
      • Re: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion, ned . freed
      • Re: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion, Keith Moore
      • Re: Finishing(!) the XML-tagging discussion, Graham Klyne
      • Re: Finishing(!) the XML-tagging discussion, Keith Moore
      • Re: Finishing(!) the XML-tagging discussion, ned . freed
      • Re: Finishing(!) the XML-tagging discussion, Martin J. Duerst
      • Re: Finishing(!) the XML-tagging discussion, Graham Klyne
      • Re: Finishing(!) the XML-tagging discussion, ned . freed
      • Re: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion, ned . freed
      • Re: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion, Keith Moore
      • Re: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion, Valdis . Kletnieks
      • Re: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion, ned . freed
      • Re: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion, John Cowan
      • Re: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion, ned . freed
      • Re: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion, ned . freed
      • Re: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion, Keith Moore
      • Re: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion, ned . freed
      • Re: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion, Keith Moore
      • Re: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion, ned . freed
      • Re: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion, Martin J. Duerst
      • Re: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion, Marshall Rose
      • Re: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion, ned . freed
      • Re: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion, Marshall Rose
      • Re: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion, ned . freed
      • Re: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion, Graham Klyne
    • Re: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion, Simon St.Laurent
    • Re: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion, ned . freed
  • RE: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion, Miles Sabin
    • RE: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion, ned . freed
  • Re: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion, Tim Bray
  • RE: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion, Dan Kohn
  • Re: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion, Tim Bray
    • Re: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion, John Cowan
    • Re: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion, ned . freed
  • Re: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion, Tim Bray
    • Re: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion, John Cowan
  • Re: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion, Tim Bray
• Some text that may be useful for the update of RFC 2376, Martin J. Duerst
  • Re: Some text that may be useful for the update of RFC 2376, Chris Lilley
    • Re: Some text that may be useful for the update of RFC 2376, MURATA Makoto
      • Re: Some text that may be useful for the update of RFC 2376, Chris Lilley
      • Re: Some text that may be useful for the update of RFC 2376, MURATA Makoto
      • Re: Some text that may be useful for the update of RFC 2376, Chris Lilley
      • Re: Some text that may be useful for the update of RFC 2376, MURATA Makoto
      • Re: Some text that may be useful for the update of RFC 2376, Chris Lilley
      • Re: Some text that may be useful for the update of RFC 2376, Martin J. Duerst
      • Re: Some text that may be useful for the update of RFC 2376, MURATA Makoto
      • Re: Some text that may be useful for the update of RFC 2376, Chris Lilley
      • Re: Some text that may be useful for the update of RFC 2376, MURATA Makoto
      • Re: Some text that may be useful for the update of RFC 2376, Chris Lilley
      • Re: Some text that may be useful for the update of RFC 2376, MURATA Makoto
      • Re: Some text that may be useful for the update of RFC 2376, Rick Jelliffe
      • Resend! Re: Some text that may be useful for the update of RFC 2376, Rick Jelliffe
      • Re: Some text that may be useful for the update of RFC 2376, Chris Lilley
      • Re: Some text that may be useful for the update of RFC 2376, MURATA Makoto
      • Re: Some text that may be useful for the update of RFC 2376, MURATA Makoto
      • Re: Some text that may be useful for the update of RFC 2376, Rick Jelliffe
      • Re: Some text that may be useful for the update of RFC 2376, MURATA Makoto
      • Re: Some text that may be useful for the update of RFC 2376, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Some text that may be useful for the update of RFC 2376, MURATA Makoto
      • Re: Some text that may be useful for the update of RFC 2376, Rick Jelliffe
      • Re: Some text that may be useful for the update of RFC 2376, MURATA Makoto
      • Re: Some text that may be useful for the update of RFC 2376, Keith Moore
      • Re: Some text that may be useful for the update of RFC 2376, Martin J. Duerst
      • Re: Some text that may be useful for the update of RFC 2376, Keith Moore
      • Re: Some text that may be useful for the update of RFC 2376, MURATA Makoto
      • Re: Some text that may be useful for the update of RFC 2376, Chris Lilley
      • Re: Some text that may be useful for the update of RFC 2376, Martin J. Duerst
      • Re: Some text that may be useful for the update of RFC 2376, Rick Jelliffe
      • Re: Some text that may be useful for the update of RFC 2376, Chris Lilley
    • Re: Some text that may be useful for the update of RFC 2376, Rick Jelliffe
      • Re: Some text that may be useful for the update of RFC 2376, MURATA Makoto
      • Re: Some text that may be useful for the update of RFC 2376, John Cowan
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Some text that may be useful for the update of RFC 2376, Langer, Paul
    • Re: Some text that may be useful for the update of RFC 2376, MURATA Makoto
      • Re: Some text that may be useful for the update of RFC 2376, Chris Lilley
      • Re: Some text that may be useful for the update of RFC 2376, Martin J. Duerst
      • Re: Some text that may be useful for the update of RFC 2376, Chris Lilley
      • Re: Some text that may be useful for the update of RFC 2376, MURATA Makoto
      • History of the charset issue, MURATA Makoto
      • Re: Some text that may be useful for the update of RFC 2376, MURATA Makoto
      • Re: Some text that may be useful for the update of RFC 2376, Chris Lilley
      • Re: Some text that may be useful for the update of RFC 2376, MURATA Makoto
  • RE: Some text that may be useful for the update of RFC 2376, Langer, Paul
    • Re: Some text that may be useful for the update of RFC 2376, MURATA Makoto
  • Re: Some text that may be useful for the update of RFC 2376, Tim Bray
  • Re: Some text that may be useful for the update of RFC 2376, Tim Bray
    • Re: Some text that may be useful for the update of RFC 2376, Keith Moore
      • Re: Some text that may be useful for the update of RFC 2376, Chris Lilley
    • Re: Some text that may be useful for the update of RFC 2376, Martin J. Duerst
      • Re: Some text that may be useful for the update of RFC 2376, Rick Jelliffe
      • Re: Some text that may be useful for the update of RFC 2376, MURATA Makoto
  • Re: Some text that may be useful for the update of RFC 2376, Christopher R. Maden
• Re: reason for application/iotp-xml (was RE: Registration of MIME med ia type APPLICATION/IOTP), Tim Bray
• Re: reason for application/iotp-xml (was RE: Registration of MIME med ia type APPLICATION/IOTP), Tim Bray
  • Re: reason for application/iotp-xml (was RE: Registration of MIME med ia type APPLICATION/IOTP), Paul Hoffman / IMC
    • Re: reason for application/iotp-xml (was RE: Registration of MIME med ia type APPLICATION/IOTP), MURATA Makoto
• Re: reason for application/iotp-xml (was RE: Registration of MIME med ia type APPLICATION/IOTP), Paul Hoffman / IMC
• RE: reason for application/iotp-xml (was RE: Registration of MIME med ia type APPLICATION/IOTP), Dan Kohn
  • Re: reason for application/iotp-xml, D. J. Bernstein
  • RE: reason for application/iotp-xml (was RE: Registration of MIME med ia type APPLICATION/IOTP), Scott Lawrence
    • Re: reason for application/iotp-xml (was RE: Registration of MIME med ia type APPLICATION/IOTP), Keith Moore
      • Re: reason for application/iotp-xml (was RE: Registration of MIME med ia type APPLICATION/IOTP), ned . freed
      • Re: reason for application/iotp-xml, D. J. Bernstein
      • Re: reason for application/iotp-xml, Keith Moore
    • RE: reason for application/iotp-xml (was RE: Registration of MIME med ia type APPLICATION/IOTP), ned . freed
    • RE: reason for application/iotp-xml (was RE: Registration of MIME med ia type APPLICATION/IOTP), Graham Klyne
      • Re: reason for application/iotp-xml (was RE: Registration of MIME med ia type APPLICATION/IOTP), Keith Moore
      • Compromises on XML Media Types (was Re: reason for application/iotp-xml), Simon St.Laurent
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: reason for application/iotp-xml (was RE: Registration of MIME med ia type APPLICATION/IOTP), Dan Kohn
    • RE: reason for application/iotp-xml (was RE: Registration of MIME med ia type APPLICATION/IOTP), Pete Resnick
• TAME & XML, BCG791
• Announcement of draft-murata-xml-02.txt, MURATA Makoto
  • Re: Announcement of draft-murata-xml-02.txt, Martin J. Duerst
    • Re: Announcement of draft-murata-xml-02.txt, MURATA Makoto
• Fwd: request for application/smil, MURATA Makoto
  • Re: Fwd: request for application/smil, Philipp Hoschka
    • Re: Fwd: request for application/smil, MURATA Makoto
      • Re: Fwd: request for application/smil, Philipp Hoschka
• Inconsistency between IETF and W3C: XML fragments and media types, MURATA Makoto
  • Re: Inconsistency between IETF and W3C: XML fragments and media types, Dan Connolly
    • Re: Inconsistency between IETF and W3C: XML fragments and media types, MURATA Makoto
      • Re: Inconsistency between IETF and W3C: XML fragments and media types, Dan Connolly
    • Re: Inconsistency between IETF and W3C: XML fragments and media types, Chris Lilley
      • RE: Inconsistency between IETF and W3C: XML fragments and media types, Larry Masinter
      • Re: Inconsistency between IETF and W3C: XML fragments and media types, Dan Connolly
      • Re: Inconsistency between IETF and W3C: XML fragments and media types, Chris Lilley
      • External parsed entities (Re: Inconsistency between IETF and W3C...), MURATA Makoto
      • Re: External parsed entities (Re: Inconsistency between IETF and W3C...), Chris Lilley
      • Re: External parsed entities (Re: Inconsistency between IETF and W3C...), MURATA Makoto
      • Re: External parsed entities (Re: Inconsistency between IETF and W3C...), Chris Lilley
      • Re: External parsed entities (Re: Inconsistency between IETF and W3C...), MURATA Makoto
      • Re: External parsed entities (Re: Inconsistency between IETF and W3C...), Chris Lilley
      • Re: External parsed entities (Re: Inconsistency between IETF and W3C...), MURATA Makoto
      • Re: External parsed entities (Re: Inconsistency between IETF and W3C...), Chris Lilley
      • RE: External parsed entities (Re: Inconsistency between IETF and W3C...), Larry Masinter
      • Re: External parsed entities (Re: Inconsistency between IETF and W3C...), Chris Lilley
      • Re: External parsed entities (Re: Inconsistency between IETF and W3C...), MURATA Makoto
      • Re: External parsed entities (Re: Inconsistency between IETF and W3C...), Chris Lilley
      • Re: External parsed entities (Re: Inconsistency between IETF and W3C...), MURATA Makoto
      • Re: External parsed entities (Re: Inconsistency between IETF and W3C...), Chris Lilley
      • Re: External parsed entities (Re: Inconsistency between IETF and W3C...), MURATA Makoto
      • Re: External parsed entities (Re: Inconsistency between IETF and W3C...), MURATA Makoto
      • Re: External parsed entities (Re: Inconsistency between IETF and W3C...), MURATA Makoto
      • Re: External parsed entities (Re: Inconsistency between IETF and W3C...), James Clark
      • Re: External parsed entities (Re: Inconsistency between IETF and W3C...), MURATA Makoto
      • Re: Inconsistency between IETF and W3C: XML fragments and media types, MURATA Makoto
  • Re: Inconsistency between IETF and W3C: XML fragments and media types, James Clark
    • Re: Inconsistency between IETF and W3C: XML fragments and media types, MURATA Makoto
• Announcement of draft-murata-xml-01.txt, MURATA Makoto
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Announcement of draft-murata-xml-01.txt, Dan Kohn
    • Re: Announcement of draft-murata-xml-01.txt, MURATA Makoto
      • RE: Announcement of draft-murata-xml-01.txt, Larry Masinter
• MIME types for presence, Martin J. Duerst
• Fwd: Fw: XHTML 1.0 returned to HTML WG, Simon St.Laurent
  • Re: Fwd: Fw: XHTML 1.0 returned to HTML WG, MURATA Makoto
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Fwd: Fw: XHTML 1.0 returned to HTML WG, Christopher R. Maden
    • Re: Fwd: Fw: XHTML 1.0 returned to HTML WG, MURATA Makoto
  • Re: Fwd: Fw: XHTML 1.0 returned to HTML WG, Terry Allen
  • Re: Fwd: Fw: XHTML 1.0 returned to HTML WG, Christopher R. Maden
    • Re: Fwd: Fw: XHTML 1.0 returned to HTML WG, MURATA Makoto
  • Re: Fwd: Fw: XHTML 1.0 returned to HTML WG, Mark Baker - Ottawa Consumer and Embedded Div.
    • Re: Fwd: Fw: XHTML 1.0 returned to HTML WG, MURATA Makoto
• Question: URI reference and media type in HTML/XML, MURATA Makoto
  • RE: Question: URI reference and media type in HTML/XML, Gavin Thomas Nicol
    • RE: Question: URI reference and media type in HTML/XML, Bert Bos
    • Re: Question: URI reference and media type in HTML/XML, MURATA Makoto
• Agreement: Fragments do not have media types, MURATA Makoto
• Keep in touch., jmaxwell8
• MIME types and fragment identifiers in HTML and XML, MURATA Makoto
  • RE: MIME types and fragment identifiers in HTML and XML, Larry Masinter
    • Re: MIME types and fragment identifiers in HTML and XML, MURATA Makoto
      • RE: MIME types and fragment identifiers in HTML and XML, Larry Masinter
      • Re: MIME types and fragment identifiers in HTML and XML, Chris Lilley
      • RE: MIME types and fragment identifiers in HTML and XML, Gavin Thomas Nicol
      • Re: MIME types and fragment identifiers in HTML and XML, John Cowan
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: MIME types and fragment identifiers in HTML and XML, Miles Sabin
• Media types for XSL stylesheets, MURATA Makoto
  • Re: Media types for XSL stylesheets, James Clark
    • Re: Media types for XSL stylesheets, MURATA Makoto
      • Re: Media types for XSL stylesheets, James Clark
      • Re: Media types for XSL stylesheets, MURATA Makoto
      • Re: Media types for XSL stylesheets, James Clark
      • Re: Media types for XSL stylesheets, MURATA Makoto
      • Re: Media types for XSL stylesheets, James Clark
      • Re: Media types for XSL stylesheets, MURATA Makoto
      • RE: Media types for XSL stylesheets, Gavin Thomas Nicol
  • Re: Media types for XSL stylesheets, John Cowan
    • Re: Media types for XSL stylesheets, MURATA Makoto
      • Re: Media types for XSL stylesheets, John Cowan
      • Re: Media types for XSL stylesheets, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Media types for XSL stylesheets, Bert Bos
      • RE: Media types for XSL stylesheets, Larry Masinter
      • Re: Media types for XSL stylesheets, Chris Lilley
      • RE: Media types for XSL stylesheets, Gavin Thomas Nicol
  • Re: Media types for XSL stylesheets, Chris Lilley
• Announcement of an I-D, MURATA Makoto
  • Re: Announcement of an I-D, Chris Lilley
    • Re: Announcement of an I-D, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Announcement of an I-D, Chris Lilley
      • Re: Announcement of an I-D, Simon St.Laurent
      • RE: Announcement of an I-D, Gavin Thomas Nicol
      • Re: Announcement of an I-D, Chris Lilley
      • Re: Announcement of an I-D, Chris Lilley
      • Re: Announcement of an I-D, MURATA Makoto
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Announcement of an I-D, MURATA Makoto
    • Re: Announcement of an I-D, Chris Lilley
      • Re: Announcement of an I-D, MURATA Makoto
• Re: Using CONNEG instead of MIME types for compound types & references, Graham Klyne
• Re: Soundbite: Proposed Suffix for XML-based media types, Tim Bray
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Soundbite: Proposed Suffix for XML-based media types, Paul Grosso
• Proposed Suffix for XML-based media types, Simon St.Laurent
  • Soundbite: Proposed Suffix for XML-based media types, Simon St.Laurent
    • Re: Soundbite: Proposed Suffix for XML-based media types, Keith Moore
      • Re: Soundbite: Proposed Suffix for XML-based media types, Murata Makoto
  • Re: Proposed Suffix for XML-based media types, Steven Pemberton
    • Re: Proposed Suffix for XML-based media types, Keith Moore
      • Re: Proposed Suffix for XML-based media types, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Proposed Suffix for XML-based media types, Steven Pemberton
      • Re: Proposed Suffix for XML-based media types, Keith Moore
  • RE: Proposed Suffix for XML-based media types, Larry Masinter
• Introduction of media types for XML DTDs, MURATA Makoto
  • RE: Introduction of media types for XML DTDs, Larry Masinter
    • RE: Introduction of media types for XML DTDs, Ned Freed
      • Re: Introduction of media types for XML DTDs, MURATA Makoto
      • Re: Introduction of media types for XML DTDs, Ned Freed
      • Re: Introduction of media types for XML DTDs, MURATA Makoto
      • Re: Introduction of media types for XML DTDs, Ned Freed
      • Re: Introduction of media types for XML DTDs, John Cowan
      • Re: Introduction of media types for XML DTDs, Ned Freed
      • Re: Introduction of media types for XML DTDs, Keith Moore
      • Re: Introduction of media types for XML DTDs, Ned Freed
      • Re: Introduction of media types for XML DTDs, John Cowan
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Introduction of media types for XML DTDs, Tim Bray
    • Re: Introduction of media types for XML DTDs, Chris Lilley
  • RE: Introduction of media types for XML DTDs, Terry Allen
    • RE: Introduction of media types for XML DTDs, Ned Freed
  • Re: Introduction of media types for XML DTDs, Terry Allen
    • Re: Introduction of media types for XML DTDs, John Cowan
  • RE: Introduction of media types for XML DTDs, Miles Sabin
  • Re: Introduction of media types for XML DTDs, Terry Allen
• Re: Media typs and XPointer, XLink, XPath, and XSLT, Paul Grosso
  • Re: Media typs and XPointer, XLink, XPath, and XSLT, John Cowan
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Media typs and XPointer, XLink, XPath, and XSLT, Tim Bray
    • Re: Media typs and XPointer, XLink, XPath, and XSLT, John Cowan
    • Re: Media typs and XPointer, XLink, XPath, and XSLT, Simon St.Laurent
  • Re: Media typs and XPointer, XLink, XPath, and XSLT, Paul Grosso
  • Re: Media typs and XPointer, XLink, XPath, and XSLT, Paul Grosso
    • RE: Media typs and XPointer, XLink, XPath, and XSLT, Larry Masinter
  • Re: Media typs and XPointer, XLink, XPath, and XSLT, dorchard
• Re: xml-mime status?, Paul Grosso
  • Media typs and XPointer, XLink, XPath, and XSLT, MURATA Makoto
    • Re: Media typs and XPointer, XLink, XPath, and XSLT, Rick Jelliffe
      • Re: Media typs and XPointer, XLink, XPath, and XSLT, John Cowan
      • Re: Media typs and XPointer, XLink, XPath, and XSLT, Shane P. McCarron
      • Re: Media typs and XPointer, XLink, XPath, and XSLT, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Media typs and XPointer, XLink, XPath, and XSLT, Chris Lilley
      • RE: Media types and XPointer, XLink, XPath, and XSLT, Larry Masinter
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: xml-mime status?, Tim Bray
• Media types, fragment identifiers, and XPointer, MURATA Makoto
  • RE: Media types, fragment identifiers, and XPointer, Larry Masinter
    • Re: Media types, fragment identifiers, and XPointer, MURATA Makoto
      • Re: Media types, fragment identifiers, and XPointer, Chris Lilley
      • Re: Media types, fragment identifiers, and XPointer, John Cowan
  • Re: Media types, fragment identifiers, and XPointer, Simon St.Laurent
    • xml-mime status?, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: xml-mime status?, MURATA Makoto
      • Defining 'fragment identifier' behavior because of XML-based MIME type, Larry Masinter
• Re: Modest Proposal, Tim Bray
  • Re: Modest Proposal, Simon St.Laurent
  • RE: Modest Proposal, Gavin Thomas Nicol
    • Re: Modest Proposal, Chris Lilley
  • Re: Modest Proposal, Chris Lilley
    • Re: Modest Proposal, Shane P. McCarron
      • Re: Modest Proposal, Simon St.Laurent
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Modest Proposal, Tim Bray
    • Re: Modest Proposal, Simon St.Laurent
    • Re: Modest Proposal, John Cowan
• Re: Using CONNEG instead of MIME types for compound types & references, Murray Altheim
  • XHTML notation structures, Rick Jelliffe
    • Re: XHTML notation structures, Shane P. McCarron
  • Modest Proposal, Simon St.Laurent
    • Re: Modest Proposal, Chris Lilley
    • Re: Modest Proposal, Ned Freed
  • FYI: XML Notation Schemas, Rick Jelliffe
  • Re: Using CONNEG instead of MIME types for compound types & references, Chris Lilley
• media types and ignorance, Tim Bray
  • Re: media types and ignorance, Rick Jelliffe
• Application-specific media types, Shane P. McCarron
  • RE: Application-specific media types, Larry Masinter
    • Re: Application-specific media types, John Cowan
  • Re: Application-specific media types, Rick Jelliffe
    • RE: Application-specific media types, Larry Masinter
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Application-specific media types, Murray Altheim
• Top-level media type xml desirable? (WAS: RE: Parameters for top -level XML media types?), Langer, Paul
  • RE: Top-level media type xml desirable? (WAS: RE: Parameters for top-level XML media types?), Larry Masinter
    • Re: Top-level media type xml desirable? (WAS: RE: Parameters for top-level XML media types?), Shane P. McCarron
      • Re: Top-level media type xml desirable? (WAS: RE: Parameters for top-level XML media types?), Simon St.Laurent
      • RE: Top-level media type xml desirable? (WAS: RE: Parameters for top-level XML media types?), Larry Masinter
      • RE: Top-level media type xml desirable? (WAS: RE: Parameters for top-level XML media types?), Simon St.Laurent
      • RE: Top-level media type xml desirable? (WAS: RE: Parameters for top-level XML media types?), Larry Masinter
      • RE: Top-level media type xml desirable? (WAS: RE: Parameters for top-level XML media types?), Paul Hoffman / IMC
      • RE: Top-level media type xml desirable? (WAS: RE: Parameters for top-level XML media types?), Ned Freed
      • RE: Top-level media type xml desirable? (WAS: RE: Parameters for top-level XML media types?), Paul Hoffman / IMC
      • RE: Top-level media type xml desirable? (WAS: RE: Parameters for top-level XML media types?), Ned Freed
      • RE: Top-level media type xml desirable? (WAS: RE: Parameters for top-level XML media types?), Ned Freed
      • Negotiated Content Delivery: Maxmimizing Information, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Negotiated Content Delivery: Maxmimizing Information, Paul Hoffman / IMC
      • Re: Negotiated Content Delivery: Maxmimizing Information, Ned Freed
      • Re: Negotiated Content Delivery: Maxmimizing Information, Paul Hoffman / IMC
      • Re: Negotiated Content Delivery: Maxmimizing Information, Ned Freed
      • Re: Negotiated Content Delivery: Maxmimizing Information, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Negotiated Content Delivery: Maxmimizing Information, Ned Freed
      • Re: Negotiated Content Delivery: Maxmimizing Information, Rick Jelliffe
      • Re: Negotiated Content Delivery: Maxmimizing Information, Ned Freed
      • Re: Negotiated Content Delivery: Maxmimizing Information, Rick Jelliffe
      • Re: Negotiated Content Delivery: Maxmimizing Information, Ned Freed
      • Re: Negotiated Content Delivery: Maxmimizing Information, Chris Lilley
      • Re: Negotiated Content Delivery: Maxmimizing Information, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Negotiated Content Delivery: Maxmimizing Information, Ned Freed
      • Using CONNEG instead of MIME types for compound types & references, Larry Masinter
      • Re: Using CONNEG instead of MIME types for compound types & references, Rick Jelliffe
      • Re: Using CONNEG instead of MIME types for compound types & references, Paul Hoffman / IMC
      • RE: Using CONNEG instead of MIME types for compound types & references, Larry Masinter
      • Re: Using CONNEG instead of MIME types for compound types & references, Shane P. McCarron
      • Re: Using CONNEG instead of MIME types for compound types & references, Frank Boumphrey

The web site for this mailing list is sponsored by the Internet Mail Consortium. If you have any suggestions for additions or corrections to this Web page, please send them to phoffman@imc.org.