Re: RELAX NG and W3C XML Schema

[MURATA Makoto <murata@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, 04 Jun 2002 08:35:14 -0700
Tim Bray <tbray@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> 
> James Clark wrote:
> > I just had a look at draft-hollenbeck-ietf-xml-guidelines-04.  Section
> > 4.6 says "XML Schema should be used as the formalism in the absence of
> > clearly stated reasons to choose another."  I strongly disagree with
> > this recommendation.
> 
> +1 to James' whole message.  To the extent that there is an IETF style 
> of doing things, RNG is right there.  My bad for not catching this. -Tim

I thank James for pointing out problems of XML Schema so clearly.

Now that RELAX NG is an ISO/IEC DIS, I think that we should prefer RELAX NG 
to XML Schema.

Cheers,

-- 
MURATA Makoto <murata@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>