[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: XML Guidelines -04

To: Martin Duerst <duerst@xxxxxx>
Subject: Re: XML Guidelines -04
From: Chris Lilley <chris@xxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2002 16:17:29 +0200
Cc: Tim Bray <tbray@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'ietf-xml-use@xxxxxxx'" <ietf-xml-use@xxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-xml-use/mail-archive/>
List-id: <ietf-xml-use.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-xml-use-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
Organization: W3C
References: <> <> <>
Reply-to: Chris Lilley <chris@xxxxxx>
Sender: owner-ietf-xml-use@xxxxxxxxxxxx

On Thursday, June 6, 2002, 11:56:34 AM, Martin wrote:

MD> Hello Tim,

>>Actually, since encoding is in the infoset, a parser that doesn't tell you 
>>is arguably nonconformant.

MD> Very good point.

Nonconformant to what?

Where is the requirement that all items in the infoset must be made
available to the application, and what is the API for obtaining such
information? IIRC the infoset is an enumeration of information that
could be made available about the instance. It is not a conformance
requirement to provide it all.

-- 
 Chris                            mailto:chris@xxxxxx

References:
- XML Guidelines -04
  - From: Hollenbeck, Scott
- Re: XML Guidelines -04
  - From: Martin Duerst
- Re: XML Guidelines -04
  - From: Martin Duerst

Prev by Date: Re: John Cowan's comments on guidelines-04
Next by Date: Re: Additional syntactic restrictions
Previous by thread: Re: XML Guidelines -04
Next by thread: Re: XML Guidelines -04
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread