[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Additional syntactic restrictions

To: ietf-xml-use@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Additional syntactic restrictions
From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2002 16:19:10 -0400
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-xml-use/mail-archive/>
List-id: <ietf-xml-use.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-xml-use-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
Organization: Red Bridge Interactive, Inc.
References: <> <> <>
Reply-to: gtn@xxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-ietf-xml-use@xxxxxxxxxxxx

On Thursday 06 June 2002 12:56 pm, Chris Lilley wrote:
> GTN> This is assuming a design for an XML-based protocol that allows
> embedding GTN> arbitrary XML content,
>
> No, its not assuming such a design. Its conceeding that some
> as-yet-unspecified IETF protiocol that uses XML might be used to
> transmit an XML payload. That doesn't seem like a stretch to me.

So how do you imagine UTF16 and UTF8 would be used in a single message?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Additional syntactic restrictions
  - From: Chris Lilley

References:
- RE: charset use of UTF-16 vs. utf-8 - Canonical XML
  - From: Larry Masinter
- Re: Additional syntactic restrictions
  - From: Gavin Thomas Nicol
- Re: Additional syntactic restrictions
  - From: Chris Lilley

Prev by Date: Re: RELAX NG and W3C XML Schema
Next by Date: Re: RELAX NG and W3C XML Schema
Previous by thread: Re: Additional syntactic restrictions
Next by thread: Re: Additional syntactic restrictions
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread