Re: XML Infoset vs XML Tagged Text

["Jean-Jacques Moreau" <moreau@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Well, certainly the equivalence XML Infoset = XML + Namespace has been 
used before by experts in the area [1]. As with any (rough) equivalence, 
it works only to a certain level.

Jean-Jacques.

[1] 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/xml-pm-ws/2001Jun/att-0009/01-XML_Proc_Model_wkshp.html

Simon St.Laurent wrote:

> At 09:29 AM 6/18/2002 +0200, Jean-Jacques Moreau wrote:
>
> > Well, if you consider that XML Infoset = XML + Namespace,
>
>
> No, XML 1.0 + Namespaces in XML = XML + Namespace.
>
> The Infoset describes an abstraction with a remarkably jargonized 
> vocabulary (information items marching about) that represents a subset 
> of XML + Namespace capabilities. The Infoset was not defined to 
> advance XML technology to any new level - it only provides 
> descriptions of capabilities.