[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: XML Infoset vs XML Tagged Text

To: simonstl@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Simon St.Laurent)
Subject: Re: XML Infoset vs XML Tagged Text
From: John Cowan <jcowan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 09:14:39 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: moreau@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Jean-Jacques Moreau), ietf-xml-use@xxxxxxx ('ietf-xml-use@xxxxxxx')
In-reply-to: <> from "Simon St.Laurent" at Jun 18, 2002 08:41:40 AM
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-xml-use/mail-archive/>
List-id: <ietf-xml-use.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-xml-use-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
Sender: owner-ietf-xml-use@xxxxxxxxxxxx

Simon St.Laurent scripsit:

> I still see little use for the Infoset in this document.

It allows the designers of an XML-based protocol not to get involved
with the minutiae of "single or double quotes?" "CDATA or &lt;?"
etc. etc.

-- 
John Cowan <jcowan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>     http://www.reutershealth.com
I amar prestar aen, han mathon ne nen,    http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
han mathon ne chae, a han noston ne 'wilith.  --Galadriel, _LOTR:FOTR_

Follow-Ups:
- Re: XML Infoset vs XML Tagged Text
  - From: Tim Bray

References:
- Re: XML Infoset vs XML Tagged Text
  - From: Simon St.Laurent

Prev by Date: Re: XML and stateless protocols
Next by Date: RE: your comments on 4.6.1 Namespaces and Attributes
Previous by thread: Re: XML Infoset vs XML Tagged Text
Next by thread: Re: XML Infoset vs XML Tagged Text
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread