(1) In section 4.13, it uses the term "numeric entity reference".
However, XML doesn't have anything called a "numeric
entity reference", it has a "numeric character reference".
This is the use of the incorrect term. (I know I've
made this slip before, so I think it's my fault).
Proposed errata:
> Section 4.13:
> "numeric entity reference" => "numeric character reference"
> Rationale: document uses incorrect term for numeric character
> references; they're not 'entity references'.
(2) Section 4.16, says that all white space is considered significant.
However, this might be confusing, because not _all_ white
space is considered significant, e.g., white space inside
tags and outside attribute values, e.g.,
e.g. <test name = "test" /> is essentially the same as
<test name="test"/>.
Proposed errata:
> Section 4.16:
>
> "In XML instances all white space is considered significant and
> is by default visible to processing applications."
>
> =>
>
> "In XML instances, white space is often significant and visible
> to processing applications."
>
>
> Rationale: While white space is often significant in XML instances,
> the rules for when it is and isn't significant are complex. Not
> _all_ white space is significant, though. The point
> of this paragraph is just to draw attention to the context,
> so explaining in more detail is unnecessary.
Please let me know if you have any objection to these
two errata.