[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: XML+RPC vs BCP70 , <?xml?> processing tag abuse?

To: Mario Salzer <mario@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: XML+RPC vs BCP70 , <?xml?> processing tag abuse?
From: Rich Salz <rsalz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 16:20:39 -0500
Cc: ietf-xml-use@xxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-xml-use/mail-archive/>
List-id: <ietf-xml-use.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-xml-use-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <>
Sender: owner-ietf-xml-use@xxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4b) Gecko/20030507

Those restrictions are fine.

Just don't call it XML anymore.

/r$

--
Rich Salz, Chief Security Architect
DataPower Technology                           http://www.datapower.com
XS40 XML Security Gateway   http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html
XML Security Overview  http://www.datapower.com/xmldev/xmlsecurity.html

References:
- XML+RPC vs BCP70 , <?xml?> processing tag abuse?
  - From: Mario Salzer

Prev by Date: XML+RPC vs BCP70 , <?xml?> processing tag abuse?
Next by Date: Re: XML+RPC vs BCP70 , <?xml?> processing tag abuse?
Previous by thread: XML+RPC vs BCP70 , <?xml?> processing tag abuse?
Next by thread: Re: XML+RPC vs BCP70 , <?xml?> processing tag abuse?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread