Re: XML+RPC vs BCP70 , <?xml?> processing tag abuse?

[Daniel Veillard <veillard@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 06:44:57PM +0100, Mario Salzer wrote:
> Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote:
> > ><?xml version="1.0" parser="yes"?>        utilizes a real XML parser
> > >
> >
> > No real XML parser will accept this.
[...]
> The draft was NOT AT ALL meant to violate the XML standard, and it
> was also NOT meant to yield not-well-formed documents. If you found
> such an example, just point me to it, this obviously then was a
> typing mistake!
> 
> Second, I didn't attempt to define XML syntax, I defined XML syntax
> for use with a protocol eventually to be called "XML+RPC". The thing
> was about not to leave everything unclear and unmentioned like UserLand
> did.

  As Eliotte pointed out, you did *both* .
And his answer was right on target, if you really could not spot that
maybe you should read his book before attempting to redefine an XML subset.

Daniel

-- 
Daniel Veillard      | Red Hat Network https://rhn.redhat.com/
veillard@xxxxxxxxxx  | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/