Re: Format of published SFL documents

[jsp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (John Pawling)]

Frank,

You make an excellent point.  The SFL documents are currently available in
Word 97.  They contain diagrams created using Word 97 which did not survive
a simple export of the documents from Word 97 as html files.  How about if
we create RTF versions??  This preserves the diagrams.  Please let me know
if RTF meets your requirements. 

ALL: If RTF is not satisfactory to anybody else, please let me know.

================================
John Pawling, jsp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx                             
J.G. Van Dyke & Associates, Inc.   
www.jgvandyke.com         
================================


At 11:58 AM 3/25/98 -0500, Frank Hecker wrote:
>An initial request to the folks at JG Van Dyke and Associates and
>others: When you publish SFL documents for public comment, could you
>please publish them in HTML (or plain text) instead of or in addition to
>formats such as MS Word?  The documents currently referenced appear to
>all be in Word97 format, and this imposes an extra burden on people who
>either don't have Word or have an earlier version.
>
>If for some reason the documents cannot be converted to HTML or would
>appear illegible in that format, it would be nice if they could at least
>be published in an earlier Word format (if Word97 can do this -- I'm not
>that familar with it).
>
>Thanks,
>
>Frank
>-- 
>Frank Hecker          Pre-sales support, Netscape government sales
>hecker@xxxxxxxxxxxx   http://people.netscape.com/hecker/
>