[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Snacc 1.3 for Windows 2K



SNACC 1.3 that was the version that BAE (then Van Dyke) started with several years ago.  It’s still publicly available and questions like this crop up when folks find it.  That’s why we tried to refer to the BAE version as “Enchanced SNACC” (esnacc) .vs. the original “snacc”.  Unless something has changed since I left BAE doesn’t support “snacc”.

 

Sorry for the history lesson, but I had nothing better to do while waiting for VISTA to load on my desktop J

 

-Pierce

 


From: owner-imc-snacc@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-imc-snacc@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Abarbanel, David (US SSA)
Sent: Friday, February 02, 2007 10:34 AM
To: sameer sanaye; imc-snacc@xxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Snacc 1.3 for Windows 2K

 

Is there any particular reason you want to use snacc 1.3?  We do not support that version anymore, and have made numerous improvements since then.  If you want to use 1.7, there are a few patches you should install on top of it.  At the moment I’m not sure how 1.3 was built and what compiler(s) it supported, but I’ll look further into that.

 

Regards,

 

Dave Abarbanel

BAE Systems

 


From: owner-imc-snacc@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-imc-snacc@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of sameer sanaye
Sent: Friday, February 02, 2007 3:58 AM
To: imc-snacc@xxxxxxx
Subject: Snacc 1.3 for Windows 2K

 

Hi,
I want to use the Snacc 1.3 in my application, but I am working with windows 2K.
I am not able to build the Snacc compiler.

I have used the 1.7 version, as it was having workspace for Visual C++, it was not a problem. But in this Snacc 1.3 I am not seeing any of such file. Even I tried to build the makefile with the help of using NMAKE. But it failed.

My question is 'Whether we could use the Snacc 1.3 on windows platform or not?'.
If we can, then what is the way to do so. Also kindly suggest the link from where I could get more information about the Snacc Compiler.

Thanks and Regards,
SSS

 


Here’s a new way to find what you're looking for - Yahoo! Answers