[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: vCard3.0 and vCal2.0
On Friday, August 16, 2002, at 08:44 AM, Bill Kearney wrote:
Great, so it's another case of being so flexible as to be way too
No, it's a question of being outside the scope of the standard,
apparently. The vCard 2 definition only describes a sort of
abstract stream of data. It doesn't say anything explicit about any
particular file format. As it happens, most people just write vCard
text into a file using ASCII for the tags and give it a "vcf"
extension (and unfortunately many omit the encoding information for
non-ASCII values, leaving it up to coincidence or heuristics to
interpret the data correctly), but this is not defined in the
standard. vCard 3 still makes no attempt to define a file format,
although it does provide a concrete definition of how to place a
vCard in a MIME wrapper, which is clearly the primary goal of that
Chris Page - Mac OS Lead, Palm Desktop - Palm, Inc.