Archive of mail-ng, by date

Go to thread index
Go to main page for mail-ng

Page 1 of 2
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [First Page] [Last Page]

Conference on Email and Anti-Spam final call for papers, Barry Leiba, 04/02/2008
Some more requirements, Brian Candler, 04/07/2005
Re: OT: Re: Less is more, Bruce Lilly, 12/06/2004
Re: Next release of my Trust-Forum project, Keith Moore, 11/01/2004
Next release of my Trust-Forum project, Sylvain Poirier, 10/31/2004
Re: CEAS, Brett Watson, 07/23/2004
Re: CEAS, Dave Crocker, 07/22/2004
CEAS, Brett Watson, 07/22/2004
Re: Meeting in San Diego?, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 07/06/2004
RE: Meeting in San Diego?, Paul Hoffman / IMC, 07/06/2004
RE: Meeting in San Diego?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07/06/2004
RE: Meeting in San Diego?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07/06/2004
Meeting in San Diego?, Hadmut Danisch, 06/26/2004
Re: Another user-visible goal, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 06/08/2004
Re: Another user-visible goal, Martin Duerst, 06/07/2004
Re: Another user-visible goal, Bruce Lilly, 06/07/2004
Re: Another user-visible goal, Martin Duerst, 06/07/2004
Re: Another user-visible goal, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 06/07/2004
Re: Another user-visible goal, Nathaniel Borenstein, 06/06/2004
Re: Another user-visible goal, Steve Hole, 06/04/2004
Re: Another user-visible goal, Rodney Tillotson, 06/04/2004
Another user-visible goal, Bruce Lilly, 06/03/2004
Re: OT: Re: Less is more, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 05/07/2004
Re: OT: Re: Less is more, Martin Duerst, 05/06/2004
Re: OT: Re: Less is more, Brett Watson, 05/06/2004
Re: OT: Re: Less is more, Brett Watson, 05/05/2004
Re: OT: Re: Less is more, Keith Moore, 05/05/2004
Re: OT: Re: Less is more, Paul Crowley, 05/05/2004
Re: OT: Re: Less is more, Paul Smith, 05/05/2004
Re: OT: Re: Less is more, Paul Smith, 05/05/2004
Re: OT: Re: Less is more, Brett Watson, 05/04/2004
Re: OT: Re: Less is more, Keith Moore, 05/04/2004
Re: OT: Re: Less is more, Keith Moore, 05/04/2004
Re: OT: Re: Less is more, Brett Watson, 05/04/2004
Re: OT: Re: Less is more, Paul Smith, 05/04/2004
Re: OT: Re: Less is more, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 05/04/2004
Re: OT: Re: Less is more, Brett Watson, 05/04/2004
Re: OT: Re: Less is more, Paul Smith, 05/04/2004
Re: OT: Re: Less is more, Keith Moore, 05/03/2004
Re: OT: Re: Less is more, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 05/03/2004
Re: OT: Re: Less is more, Brett Watson, 05/03/2004
RE: OT: Re: Less is more, Victor Engmark, 05/03/2004
Re: OT: Re: Less is more, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 05/03/2004
Re: OT: Re: Less is more, Keith Moore, 05/03/2004
Re: OT: Re: Less is more, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 05/03/2004
Re: OT: Re: Less is more, Keith Moore, 05/02/2004
Re: Dates: the can of worms, Brett Watson, 05/01/2004
Re: Dates: the can of worms, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 05/01/2004
Dates: the can of worms, Brett Watson, 04/30/2004
Re: OT: Re: Less is more, Keith Moore, 04/30/2004
Re: OT: Re: Less is more, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 04/30/2004
Re: OT: Re: Less is more, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 04/30/2004
Re: OT: Re: Less is more, Keith Moore, 04/30/2004
Re: OT: Re: Less is more, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 04/30/2004
Re: Human Readable vs Machine Readable, Keith Moore, 04/30/2004
Re: OT: Re: Less is more, Keith Moore, 04/30/2004
Re: Less is more, Keith Moore, 04/29/2004
Re: Less is more, Martin Duerst, 04/29/2004
Re: OT: Re: Less is more, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 04/29/2004
Re: OT: Re: Less is more, Frode Gill, 04/29/2004
OT: Re: Less is more, Frode Gill, 04/29/2004
Re: Less is more, Keith Moore, 04/29/2004
Re: Less is more, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 04/29/2004
Re: Less is more, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 04/29/2004
Human Readable vs Machine Readable, Brett Watson, 04/29/2004
Re: Less is more, Keith Moore, 04/28/2004
Re: Less is more, Keith Moore, 04/28/2004
Re: Less is more, Keith Moore, 04/28/2004
Re: Less is more, Graham Klyne, 04/28/2004
Re: Less is more, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 04/27/2004
Re: Less is more, Brett Watson, 04/27/2004
Re: Less is more, Mike Higginbottom, 04/27/2004
Re: Less is more, Frode Gill, 04/27/2004
Re: Less is more, Keith Moore, 04/27/2004
Re: Less is more, Markus Stumpf, 04/27/2004
Re: Less is more, Frode Gill, 04/27/2004
Re: Less is more, Keith Moore, 04/27/2004
Re: Less is more, Brett Watson, 04/27/2004
Less is more, Frode Gill, 04/27/2004
【全台最低價】沙宣美髮學院教妳3分鐘亮麗有型 , 創意生活家, 04/07/2004
【全台最低價】搜尋商品第一名 ~ 窈窕美臀人氣王!! , 創意生活家, 04/07/2004
Advert: mail-ng-skb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx - generic Drugs - lowest price.., Aggressive O. Spitted, 04/06/2004
AFTER DUE CONSIDERATION, MRS SUZANNE MARGERY OKADIGBO, 04/06/2004
【全台最低價】陳孝萱美麗推薦~~五行瘦身音樂療法, 創意生活家, 04/06/2004
INTERESTING, Dr Fred Grandville, 04/06/2004
美髮專家沙宣四合一平板整髮器全台最優惠!!, 創意生活家, 04/05/2004
WINNING NOTIFICATION, ZENITH LOTTERY INT., 04/05/2004
百貨on sale !! 名牌香水全面八折以下.htm, 創意生活家, 04/02/2004
植村秀泡沫隔離霜UV17電子報, 創意生活家, 04/02/2004
PLEAES HELP ME, WOLNY OLKUSZ, 04/02/2004
Let's talk, david brown, 03/31/2004
Re: ...still alive?, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 03/31/2004
...still alive?, Hadmut Danisch, 03/31/2004
PROJECT INTEREST, Edward Lowe, 03/28/2004
CONGRATULATION LUCKY WINNER, Lottery Post, 03/24/2004
Earn $500 to $700 per week, gwerw, 03/23/2004
=?gb2312?b?xfPT0cT6usOjoaOh?=, hill, 03/23/2004
=?gb2312?b?xfPT0cT6usOjoaOho6E=?=, hill, 03/23/2004
=?gb2312?b?xfPT0aOhxPq6w6Oho6GjoQ==?=, wayne, 03/21/2004
Advert: mail-ng-skb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx - Fw: Payment Due, account., Stages A. Coffeehouses, 03/20/2004
CONGRATULATIONS!!!!!., MRS.RENEE ALEX, 03/20/2004
Winning Notification !!!, EURO STAKES INTERNATIONAL., 03/17/2004
edward, edward, 03/17/2004
from nneka, from nneka, 03/17/2004
CLAIM YOUR LUCKY WINNING..., lottoelgordo, 03/15/2004
Sadiq Oil, Albert Sule, 03/13/2004
Advert: mail-ng-skb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx - Fw: Payment Past Due, acct., Sakharov A. Ats, 03/13/2004
please reply urgently, salif ibrahim, 03/12/2004
Re: Operations requirement: no hop-by-hop, Dave Crocker, 03/11/2004
Re: Operations requirement: no hop-by-hop, Paul Hoffman / IMC, 03/11/2004
Re: Operations requirement: no hop-by-hop, Dave Crocker, 03/11/2004
Re: Operations requirement: no hop-by-hop, Mark Baugher, 03/11/2004
Re: Operations requirement: no hop-by-hop, Einar Stefferud, 03/10/2004
Re: Operations requirement: no hop-by-hop, Paul Hoffman / IMC, 03/10/2004
Re: Operations requirement: no hop-by-hop, Dave Crocker, 03/10/2004
Advert: mail-ng-skb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx - Fw: Suspended Account., Jenna P. Neuralgic, 03/09/2004
Re: Goal: easier cpu parsable opt out tags, Doug Royer, 03/03/2004
Re: Goal: easier cpu parsable opt out tags, Dave Crocker, 03/03/2004
Re: Goal: easier cpu parsable opt out tags, Doug Royer, 03/02/2004
Re: Goal: easier cpu parsable opt out tags, Dave Crocker, 03/02/2004
Re: SMTP and multicasting, Doug Royer, 03/01/2004
Re: SMTP and multicasting, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 03/01/2004
Re: SMTP and multicasting, Doug Royer, 03/01/2004
Re: Goal: easier cpu parsable opt out tags, Doug Royer, 03/01/2004
Re: Goal: easier cpu parsable opt out tags, Brett Watson, 02/29/2004
Goal: easier cpu parsable opt out tags, Doug Royer, 02/29/2004
Re: mailbox format(s), Bruce Lilly, 02/28/2004
Re: mailbox format(s), Richard Welty, 02/28/2004
Re: mailbox format(s), Iljitsch van Beijnum, 02/28/2004
Re: SMTP and multicasting, Hadmut Danisch, 02/28/2004
Re: mailbox format(s), Bruce Lilly, 02/27/2004
Re: mailbox format(s), Iljitsch van Beijnum, 02/27/2004
Re: mailbox format(s), Bruce Lilly, 02/27/2004
Re: mailbox format(s), Iljitsch van Beijnum, 02/27/2004
RE: mailbox format(s), Victor Engmark, 02/27/2004
Re: mailbox format(s), Brett Watson, 02/26/2004
Re: Transport Protocol vs. Message Format, Bruce Lilly, 02/26/2004
Re: mailbox format(s), Bruce Lilly, 02/26/2004
Re: mailbox format(s), Martin Duerst, 02/26/2004
Re: Transport Protocol vs. Message Format, Martin Duerst, 02/26/2004
Re: mailbox format(s), Iljitsch van Beijnum, 02/26/2004
RE: visions, Victor Engmark, 02/26/2004
Re: user-visible goals, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 02/26/2004
Re: mailbox format(s), J C Lawrence, 02/26/2004
Re: mailbox format(s), Gu簩j顤n S. Hreinsson, 02/26/2004
Re: visions, Paul Smith, 02/26/2004
Re: mailbox format(s), Iljitsch van Beijnum, 02/26/2004
mailbox format(s), Bruce Lilly, 02/26/2004
Re: Transport Protocol vs. Message Format, John Berthels, 02/26/2004
Re: SMTP and multicasting, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 02/26/2004
RE: More user-visible goals, Victor Engmark, 02/26/2004
Transport Protocol vs. Message Format, Brett Watson, 02/26/2004
Re: visions, Bruce Lilly, 02/25/2004
Re: user-visible goals, Dave Crocker, 02/25/2004
RE: SMTP and multicasting, Bonatti, Chris, 02/25/2004
RE: visions, Dustin D. Trammell, 02/25/2004
Re: visions, Markus Stumpf, 02/25/2004
Re: visions, Bruce Lilly, 02/25/2004
Re: More user-visible goals, Martin Duerst, 02/25/2004
Re: visions, Markus Stumpf, 02/25/2004
Re: user-visible goals, Bruce Lilly, 02/25/2004
Re: visions, Bruce Lilly, 02/25/2004
More user-visible goals, Bruce Lilly, 02/25/2004
RE: user-visible goals, Victor Engmark, 02/25/2004
Re: user-visible goals, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 02/25/2004
Re: user-visible goals, Bruce Lilly, 02/25/2004
Re: user-visible goals, Markus Stumpf, 02/24/2004
Re: user-visible goals, Bruce Lilly, 02/24/2004
RE: user-visible goals, Secretariat, 02/24/2004
Re: Operations requirement: no hop-by-hop, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 02/24/2004
RE: user-visible goals, Victor Engmark, 02/24/2004
Re: Operations requirement: no hop-by-hop, John Berthels, 02/24/2004
RE: user-visible goals, Victor Engmark, 02/24/2004
Re: visions, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 02/23/2004
Re: user-visible goals, Hector Santos, 02/23/2004
Re: user-visible goals, Bruce Lilly, 02/23/2004
Re: visions, Markus Stumpf, 02/23/2004
Re: visions, Markus Stumpf, 02/23/2004
Re: visions, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 02/23/2004
RE: visions, Piers Chivers, 02/23/2004
visions, Markus Stumpf, 02/23/2004
Re: Writing it down, James Seng, 02/23/2004
Re: Email or Something Else, Abe Drier, 02/21/2004
Re: Email or Something Else, Hector Santos, 02/21/2004
Re: Email or Something Else, Paul Crowley, 02/21/2004
RE: Email or Something Else, Bonatti, Chris, 02/21/2004
RE: Email or Something Else, David W Morgan, 02/21/2004
FW: Email or Something Else, David W Morgan, 02/21/2004
Re: Email or Something Else, Hadmut Danisch, 02/21/2004
Re: Email or Something Else, Keith Moore, 02/21/2004
Re: Email or Something Else, Hadmut Danisch, 02/21/2004
Re: Email or Something Else, Keith Moore, 02/20/2004
RE: Email or Something Else, David W Morgan, 02/20/2004
f2f meeting on mail architecture and infrastructure, Secretariat, 02/15/2004
Re: Operations requirement: no hop-by-hop, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 02/14/2004
Re: Operations requirement: no hop-by-hop, Richard Welty, 02/13/2004
External Body (Re: Mail Path MTU discovery?), Brett Watson, 02/13/2004
Re: Mail Path MTU discovery?, Einar Stefferud, 02/13/2004
Re: Operations requirement: no hop-by-hop, william(at)elan.net, 02/13/2004
Re: Mail Path MTU discovery?, Hadmut Danisch, 02/13/2004
Re: Mail Path MTU discovery?, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 02/13/2004
Re: Operations requirement: no hop-by-hop, Keith Moore, 02/13/2004
Re: Operations requirement: no hop-by-hop, Paul Hoffman / IMC, 02/13/2004
Re: Operations requirement: no hop-by-hop, Keith Moore, 02/13/2004
Operations requirement: no hop-by-hop, Paul Hoffman / IMC, 02/13/2004
Mail expiry before delivery, Hadmut Danisch, 02/13/2004
Mail Path MTU discovery?, Hadmut Danisch, 02/13/2004
Re: Mail Cookies, Hadmut Danisch, 02/13/2004
Re: Mail Cookies, Hadmut Danisch, 02/13/2004
Re: Mail Cookies, John Berthels, 02/13/2004
Re: Storage: service provider vs user, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 02/13/2004
Re: Storage: service provider vs user, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 02/13/2004
Re: Storage: service provider vs user, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 02/13/2004
Re: Mail Cookies, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 02/13/2004
Re: Storage: service provider vs user, Hector Santos, 02/12/2004
Re: Consensual communication (Re: Visible feature: not free to send?), Alex van den Bogaerdt, 02/12/2004
Re: Consensual communication (Re: Visible feature: not free to send?), Einar Stefferud, 02/12/2004
Storage: service provider vs user, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 02/12/2004
Re: Mail Cookies, william<at>elan.net, 02/12/2004
Re: Mail Cookies, Steve Hole, 02/12/2004
Re: Mail Cookies, Hadmut Danisch, 02/12/2004
Re: Mail Cookies, Steve Hole, 02/12/2004
Re: Consensual communication (Re: Visible feature: not free to send?), Graham Klyne, 02/12/2004
Consensual communication (Re: Visible feature: not free to send?), Brett Watson, 02/12/2004
Re: Mail Cookies, John Berthels, 02/12/2004
Visible feature: not free to send?, Graham Klyne, 02/12/2004
Re: Mail Cookies, Brett Watson, 02/11/2004
Re: Mail Cookies, Dave Crocker, 02/11/2004
Re: Mail Cookies, Hadmut Danisch, 02/11/2004
Re: Mail Cookies, Dave Crocker, 02/11/2004
Re: The need for two headers, Hadmut Danisch, 02/11/2004
Re: The need for two headers, Hadmut Danisch, 02/11/2004
Re: Mail Cookies, Hadmut Danisch, 02/11/2004
Re: The need for two headers, Martin Duerst, 02/11/2004
Re: The need for two headers, Martin Duerst, 02/11/2004
Re: Mail Cookies, Dave Crocker, 02/11/2004
Mail Cookies, Hadmut Danisch, 02/11/2004
Class of Service, Jhbritten, 02/11/2004
RE: On the spam problem..., Bonatti, Chris, 02/11/2004
RE: list of user-visible goals, Victor Engmark, 02/10/2004
RE: Email or Something Else, Paul Hoffman / IMC, 02/10/2004
New International Requirements Possibly?, Hector Santos, 02/10/2004
Re: Email or Something Else, Hector Santos, 02/10/2004
Re: Email or Something Else, Hadmut Danisch, 02/09/2004
Re: Email or Something Else, Hadmut Danisch, 02/09/2004
Automating Permission/Trust based system, Hector Santos, 02/09/2004
RE: Email or Something Else, Bonatti, Chris, 02/09/2004
user requirement -- Re: built-in spam burden & email privacy protection, Ed Gerck, 02/09/2004
Re: built-in spam burden & email privacy protection, Paul Hoffman / IMC, 02/09/2004
Re: built-in spam burden & email privacy protection, Ed Gerck, 02/09/2004
Re: Email or Something Else, Paul Hoffman / IMC, 02/09/2004
Re: built-in spam burden & email privacy protection, Dave Crocker, 02/09/2004
Re: Email or Something Else, Paul Crowley, 02/09/2004
Email or Something Else, Bonatti, Chris, 02/09/2004
Goals: Readability / transferability, Victor Engmark, 02/09/2004
RE: Why XML (was: Re: What I see as problems to solve ... and a strawman solution), Jim Schaad, 02/08/2004
Re: built-in spam burden & email privacy protection, Paul Hoffman / IMC, 02/08/2004
built-in spam burden & email privacy protection, Ed Gerck, 02/08/2004
Re: operator-visible goals?, Keith Moore, 02/08/2004
Re: operator-visible goals?, Keith Moore, 02/08/2004
Re: Challenge Response ?, Hadmut Danisch, 02/08/2004
Re: operator-visible goals?, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 02/08/2004
Re: The need for two headers, Paul Hoffman / IMC, 02/08/2004
Re: operator-visible goals?, Paul Hoffman / IMC, 02/08/2004
Re: Challenge Response ?, william@xxxxxxxx, 02/08/2004
Re: The need for two headers, Paul Crowley, 02/08/2004
Re: Challenge Response ?, Paul Crowley, 02/08/2004
Re: The need for two headers, Brett Watson, 02/08/2004
Re: The need for two headers, Steven F Siirila, 02/08/2004
Re: Legal Requirements?, Hadmut Danisch, 02/08/2004
Re: Another User Requirement Consider: Dates, Hector Santos, 02/08/2004
Re: additional requirements, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 02/08/2004
RE: Legal Requirements?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 02/08/2004
Re: The need for two headers, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 02/08/2004
Challenge Response ?, Hadmut Danisch, 02/08/2004
Re: The need for two headers, Hadmut Danisch, 02/08/2004
Re: Legal Requirements?, Hadmut Danisch, 02/08/2004
Re: Another User Requirement Consider: Dates, Brett Watson, 02/07/2004
Another User Requirement Consider: Dates, Hector Santos, 02/07/2004
Re: additional requirements, Hector Santos, 02/07/2004
Re: The need for two headers, Brett Watson, 02/07/2004
Re: Legal Requirements?, Hector Santos, 02/07/2004
additional requirements, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 02/07/2004
Re: Legal Requirements?, Paul Hoffman / IMC, 02/07/2004
Re: Legal Requirements?, Hadmut Danisch, 02/07/2004
Re: operator-visible goals?, Hadmut Danisch, 02/07/2004
Re: Legal Requirements?, Paul Hoffman / IMC, 02/07/2004
Re: operator-visible goals?, Hector Santos, 02/07/2004
Re: The need for two headers, Paul Crowley, 02/07/2004
Re: operator-visible goals?, Keith Moore, 02/07/2004
Re: operator-visible goals?, Hadmut Danisch, 02/07/2004
Re: list of user-visible goals, Hector Santos, 02/07/2004
operator-visible goals?, Keith Moore, 02/07/2004
Re: taxonomies, Einar Stefferud, 02/07/2004
Legal Requirements?, Hadmut Danisch, 02/07/2004
Re: The need for two headers, Hadmut Danisch, 02/07/2004
Re: VMN: Virtual Mail Networks (ESMTP), Paul Hoffman / IMC, 02/07/2004
Re: The need for two headers, Paul Hoffman / IMC, 02/07/2004
Re: The need for two headers, Hadmut Danisch, 02/07/2004
Re: VMN: Virtual Mail Networks (ESMTP), Andrzej Filip, 02/07/2004
Re: The need for two headers, Paul Hoffman / IMC, 02/07/2004
Re: VMN: Virtual Mail Networks (ESMTP), Paul Hoffman / IMC, 02/07/2004
Re: The need for two headers, Hadmut Danisch, 02/07/2004
Re: The need for two headers, Andrzej Filip, 02/07/2004
Transport classes, Hadmut Danisch, 02/07/2004
The need for two headers, Hadmut Danisch, 02/07/2004
VMN: Virtual Mail Networks (ESMTP), Andrzej Filip, 02/07/2004
Re: taxonomies, Eric A. Hall, 02/07/2004
Re: taxonomies, Ed Gerck, 02/06/2004
Re: taxonomies, Ed Gerck, 02/06/2004
Re: taxonomies, Paul Hoffman / IMC, 02/06/2004
Re: taxonomies, Martin Duerst, 02/06/2004
Re: taxonomies, Paul Hoffman / IMC, 02/06/2004
Re: taxonomies, Hadmut Danisch, 02/06/2004
RE: list of user-visible goals, Ian Peter, 02/06/2004
Re: taxonomies, Eric A. Hall, 02/06/2004
Re: No misdirected 'vacation' messages, william@xxxxxxxx, 02/06/2004
Re: taxonomies, Paul Hoffman / IMC, 02/06/2004
Email address mobility, Jochen Topf, 02/06/2004
Re: list of user-visible goals, Hadmut Danisch, 02/06/2004
Re: list of user-visible goals, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 02/06/2004
Re: list of user-visible goals, Hector Santos, 02/06/2004
Re: taxonomies, Hector Santos, 02/06/2004
Re: On the spam problem..., Jacob Palme, 02/06/2004
Re: list of user-visible goals, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 02/06/2004
RE: list of user-visible goals, Ian Peter, 02/06/2004
taxonomies, Eric A. Hall, 02/06/2004
Re: list of user-visible goals, Hadmut Danisch, 02/05/2004
Re: list of user-visible goals, Hadmut Danisch, 02/05/2004
Re: list of user-visible goals, ipeter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 02/05/2004
Re: list of user-visible goals, Brett Watson, 02/05/2004
My thoughts, Hadmut Danisch, 02/05/2004
File/message size, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 02/05/2004
Re: list of user-visible goals, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 02/05/2004
Re: list of user-visible goals, John Wagner, 02/05/2004
Re: list of user-visible goals, Keith Moore, 02/05/2004
Re: list of user-visible goals, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 02/05/2004
Re: No misdirected 'vacation' messages, Martin Duerst, 02/05/2004
Re: No misdirected 'vacation' messages, Martin Duerst, 02/05/2004
coherence requirements, Ed Gerck, 02/05/2004
Re: What I see as problems to solve ... and a strawman solution, Kai Henningsen, 02/05/2004
Re: SMTP and multicasting, Jacob Palme, 02/05/2004
Re: On the spam problem..., Jacob Palme, 02/05/2004
Re: list of user-visible goals, Keith Moore, 02/05/2004
Writing it down, Paul Hoffman / IMC, 02/05/2004
Re: No misdirected 'vacation' messages, Paul Smith, 02/05/2004
Re: No misdirected 'vacation' messages, Keith Moore, 02/05/2004
Re: No misdirected 'vacation' messages, Gu簩j顤n S. Hreinsson, 02/05/2004
Re: No misdirected 'vacation' messages, Charles Cazabon, 02/05/2004
Re: No misdirected 'vacation' messages, william@xxxxxxxx, 02/05/2004
Re: list of user-visible goals, Keith Moore, 02/05/2004
mailbox with more than one user behind it (but not mailing list), Martin Duerst, 02/05/2004
Re: list of user-visible goals, Martin Duerst, 02/05/2004
No misdirected 'vacation' messages, Martin Duerst, 02/05/2004
Re: list of user-visible goals, Martin Duerst, 02/05/2004
wish: more consistent reject,... messages, Martin Duerst, 02/05/2004
RE: list of user-visible goals, Victor Engmark, 02/05/2004
Re: list of user-visible goals, Hector Santos, 02/05/2004
Re: list of user-visible goals, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 02/05/2004
Re: list of user-visible goals, John Berthels, 02/05/2004
Re: On the spam problem..., Iljitsch van Beijnum, 02/05/2004
Re: list of user-visible goals, Paul Crowley, 02/05/2004
Re: list of user-visible goals, Brett Watson, 02/04/2004
Re: list of user-visible goals, Hector Santos, 02/04/2004
Re: list of user-visible goals, Brett Watson, 02/04/2004
list of user-visible goals, Keith Moore, 02/04/2004
Re: On the spam problem..., Einar Stefferud, 02/04/2004
RE: On the spam problem..., Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 02/04/2004
Re: the evils of quoting, Paul Robinson, 02/04/2004
Re: SMTP and multicasting, Hector Santos, 02/04/2004
Should we have dual e-mail address, one of which is in Latin only?, Jacob Palme, 02/04/2004
SMTP and multicasting, Jacob Palme, 02/04/2004
Re: the evils of quoting, Paul Smith, 02/04/2004
Re: user-visible goals, Hector Santos, 02/03/2004
Re: suggestions for reducing message volume, Hector Santos, 02/03/2004
Message Tracking -> [was Re: Re-merging headers (was: Re: Use of XML as a basis for e-mail)], Hector Santos, 02/03/2004
Re: user-visible goals, Paul Crowley, 02/03/2004
Re: user-visible goals, ipeter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 02/03/2004
Re: suggestions for reducing message volume, Paul Hoffman / IMC, 02/03/2004
The colour of the bike shed, Paul Crowley, 02/03/2004
Re: user-visible goals, Mark Baugher, 02/03/2004
Re: suggestions for reducing message volume, Doug Royer, 02/03/2004
Re: Use of XML as a basis for e-mail, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 02/03/2004
Re-merging headers (was: Re: Use of XML as a basis for e-mail), Martin Duerst, 02/03/2004
Re: Potential goal: recipient control of data transfer, Martin Duerst, 02/03/2004
Re: a few short notes, Chuq Von Rospach, 02/03/2004
Re: suggestions for reducing message volume, Paul Hoffman / IMC, 02/03/2004
Re: Use of XML as a basis for e-mail, Chuq Von Rospach, 02/03/2004
Re: Use of XML as a basis for e-mail, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 02/03/2004
suggestions for reducing message volume, Keith Moore, 02/03/2004
XML is irrelevant -> was RE: XML consideration. [Was Re: a few short notes], Paul Lambert, 02/03/2004
Re: Use of XML as a basis for e-mail, Paul Crowley, 02/03/2004
Re: the evils of quoting, Chuq Von Rospach, 02/03/2004
Re: a few short notes, Doug Royer, 02/03/2004
Re: Use of XML as a basis for e-mail, Eric A. Hall, 02/03/2004
Re: a few short notes, James Craig Burley, 02/03/2004
Re: the evils of quoting, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 02/03/2004
Re: Use of XML as a basis for e-mail, Chuq Von Rospach, 02/03/2004
Re: the evils of quoting, was: Use of XML as a basis for e-mail, Chuq Von Rospach, 02/03/2004
Re: Use of XML as a basis for e-mail, Chuq Von Rospach, 02/03/2004
Re: the evils of quoting, was: Use of XML as a basis for e-mail, Chuq Von Rospach, 02/03/2004
Re: a few short notes, Chuq Von Rospach, 02/03/2004
Re: a few short notes, Chuq Von Rospach, 02/03/2004
RE: the evils of quoting, was: Use of XML as a basis for e-mail, Victor Engmark, 02/03/2004
Re: a few short notes, william@xxxxxxxx, 02/03/2004
Re: a few short notes, James Craig Burley, 02/03/2004
Re: a few short notes, James Craig Burley, 02/03/2004
Re: a few short notes, Brett Watson, 02/03/2004
Re: Non-latin email addresses dangerous?, Secretariat, 02/03/2004
Re: Use of XML as a basis for e-mail, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 02/03/2004
Re: a few short notes, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 02/03/2004
Re: a few short notes, Paul Robinson, 02/03/2004
Re: a few short notes, Paul Smith, 02/03/2004
Re: a few short notes, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 02/03/2004
Re: Use of XML as a basis for e-mail, Paul Robinson, 02/03/2004
Re: a few short notes, Paul Robinson, 02/03/2004
Re: a few short notes, Paul Robinson, 02/03/2004
Re: a few short notes, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 02/03/2004
Re: Use of XML as a basis for e-mail, Hector Santos, 02/03/2004
Re: a few short notes, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 02/03/2004
Potential goal: recipient control of data transfer, Brett Watson, 02/03/2004
Re: a few short notes, Paul Crowley, 02/03/2004
Re: a few short notes, Paul Robinson, 02/03/2004
Re: a few short notes, Jacob Palme, 02/03/2004
Anonymity, Jacob Palme, 02/03/2004
Re: the evils of quoting, was: Use of XML as a basis for e-mail, Paul Robinson, 02/03/2004
Re: a few short notes, Paul Robinson, 02/03/2004
Re: Use of XML as a basis for e-mail, Paul Robinson, 02/03/2004
Another goal: easier to configure software, Graham Klyne, 02/03/2004
XML Schema for emails, Victor Engmark, 02/03/2004
Re: Authentication, Sender Validation, Mail Filtering Considerations, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 02/03/2004
Re: a few short notes, Paul Smith, 02/03/2004
the evils of quoting, was: Use of XML as a basis for e-mail, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 02/03/2004
XML consideration. [Was Re: a few short notes], Hector Santos, 02/03/2004
Re: Use of XML as a basis for e-mail, Paul Crowley, 02/03/2004
Authentication, Sender Validation, Mail Filtering Considerations, Hector Santos, 02/03/2004
Re: a few short notes, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 02/03/2004
Re: Use of XML as a basis for e-mail, Hector Santos, 02/03/2004
Re: a few short notes, Hector Santos, 02/02/2004
Re: a few short notes, Keith Moore, 02/02/2004
Re: user-visible goals, Eric A. Hall, 02/02/2004
Re: Delete all and replace is practical, Keith Moore, 02/02/2004
Re: a few short notes, Paul Crowley, 02/02/2004
Re: user-visible goals, Paul Crowley, 02/02/2004
Re: a few short notes, Paul Robinson, 02/02/2004
Re: user-visible goals, ipeter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 02/02/2004
Re: user-visible goals, Doug Royer, 02/02/2004
Re: a few short notes, Doug Royer, 02/02/2004
Re: a few short notes, Martin Duerst, 02/02/2004
RE: Why XML (was: Re: What I see as problems to solve ... and a strawman solution), Martin Duerst, 02/02/2004
Re: user-visible goals, Charles Cazabon, 02/02/2004
Re: user-visible goals, Doug Royer, 02/02/2004
Re: a few short notes, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 02/02/2004
Re: a few short notes, Martin Duerst, 02/02/2004
Re: a few short notes, Martin Duerst, 02/02/2004
Re: a few short notes, Martin Duerst, 02/02/2004
Re: a few short notes, Martin Duerst, 02/02/2004
Re: a few short notes, Eric A. Hall, 02/02/2004
Chains of trust vs. PKI, Paul Crowley, 02/02/2004
Re: a few short notes, Paul Smith, 02/02/2004
Re: Use of XML as a basis for e-mail, Chuq Von Rospach, 02/02/2004
RE: What I see as problems to solve ... and a strawman solution, Martin Duerst, 02/02/2004
Re: a few short notes, Chuq Von Rospach, 02/02/2004
Re: summary the discussion so far, Paul Hoffman / IMC, 02/02/2004
Re: explicitly forming relationships, Hector Santos, 02/02/2004
Re: One user, many addresses, Martin Duerst, 02/02/2004
Re: user-visible goals, Martin Duerst, 02/02/2004
Re: One user, many addresses, Martin Duerst, 02/02/2004
Re: a few short notes, Paul Smith, 02/02/2004
Re: encoding issues, was: What I see as problems to solve ... and a strawman solution, Paul Crowley, 02/02/2004
Re: user-visible goals, Hector Santos, 02/02/2004
RE: Use of XML as a basis for e-mail, Paul Smith, 02/02/2004
encoding issues, was: What I see as problems to solve ... and a strawman solution, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 02/02/2004
Re: a few short notes, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 02/02/2004
Re: a few short notes, Paul Robinson, 02/02/2004
Re: a few short notes, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 02/02/2004
Re: a few short notes, Paul Robinson, 02/02/2004
Re: Non-latin email addresses dangerous?, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 02/02/2004
Re: summary the discussion so far, Paul Robinson, 02/02/2004
RE: What I see as problems to solve ... and a strawman solution, Shawn C. Masters, 02/02/2004
RE: Use of XML as a basis for e-mail, Shawn C. Masters, 02/02/2004
Re: Use of XML as a basis for e-mail, Brett Watson, 02/02/2004
Re: What I see as problems to solve ... and a strawman solution, Paul Smith, 02/02/2004
Re: a few short notes, Paul Smith, 02/02/2004
Re: user-visible goals, Paul Smith, 02/02/2004
Re: a few short notes, Paul Smith, 02/02/2004
Re: What I see as problems to solve ... and a strawman solution, Kai Henningsen, 02/02/2004
Use of XML as a basis for e-mail, Jacob Palme, 02/02/2004
Re: On the spam problem..., Jacob Palme, 02/02/2004
Re: user-visible goals, Paul Crowley, 02/02/2004
Re: user-visible goals, Keith Moore, 02/01/2004
Re: user-visible goals, Einar Stefferud, 02/01/2004
"requirements documents" considered harmful, Keith Moore, 02/01/2004
Re: user-visible goals, william@xxxxxxxx, 02/01/2004
Re: user-visible goals, Keith Moore, 02/01/2004
Re: user-visible goals, Chuq Von Rospach, 02/01/2004
Re: One user, many addresses, Chuq Von Rospach, 02/01/2004
Re: user-visible goals, Keith Moore, 02/01/2004
Re: a few short notes, Chuq Von Rospach, 02/01/2004
Re: user-visible goals, Keith Moore, 02/01/2004

Page 1 of 2
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [First Page] [Last Page]

The web site for this mailing list is sponsored by the Internet Mail Consortium. If you have any suggestions for additions or corrections to this Web page, please send them to phoffman@imc.org.