[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Delete all and replace is practical

To: Fred Baker <fred@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Delete all and replace is practical
From: Keith Moore <moore@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 21:56:07 -0500
Cc: Keith Moore <moore@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, mail-ng@xxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <6.0.1.1.2.20040131163826.05124860@mira-sjc5-b.cisco.com >
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/mail-ng/mail-archive/>
List-id: <mail-ng.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mail-ng-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <> <6.0.1.1.2.20040131163826.05124860@mira-sjc5-b.cisco.com >
Sender: owner-mail-ng@xxxxxxxxxxxx

The core problem of email as far as I am concerned is the interminable
forwarding problem.
There I will disagree. The present model in fact gets messages from where they are to where they need to go.

the present model in fact loses a fair number of messages. in my experience, email is less reliable than snail mail.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Delete all and replace is practical
  - From: Paul Smith

References:
- RE: Delete all and replace is practical
  - From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: Delete all and replace is practical
  - From: Fred Baker

Prev by Date: Re: On the spam problem...
Next by Date: Re: Why are we here? What are our goals?
Previous by thread: RE: Delete all and replace is practical
Next by thread: Re: Delete all and replace is practical
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread