[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Message Routing Philosophy

To: James Craig Burley <craig@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Message Routing Philosophy
From: Chuq Von Rospach <chuqui@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2004 09:52:10 -0800
Cc: Chuq Von Rospach <chuqui@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, mail-ng@xxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/mail-ng/mail-archive/>
List-id: <mail-ng.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mail-ng-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <> <>
Sender: owner-mail-ng@xxxxxxxxxxxx

On Feb 1, 2004, at 8:55 AM, James Craig Burley wrote:

I don't know much about IM, aside from that it's popular and such.

Learning about why it's growing in popularity while e-mail is challenged would be a good exercise in understanding user needs as we move forward in email-ng... It's obviously doing something right that e-mail can learn from....

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Message Routing Philosophy - IM model
  - From: Doug Royer

References:
- Re: Message Routing Philosophy
  - From: william@xxxxxxxx
- Re: Message Routing Philosophy
  - From: James Craig Burley

Prev by Date: Re: a few short notes
Next by Date: Forging of origin address
Previous by thread: Re: Message Routing Philosophy
Next by thread: Re: Message Routing Philosophy - IM model
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread