[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Message Routing Philosophy - IM model

To: mail-ng@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Message Routing Philosophy - IM model
From: Chuq Von Rospach <chuqui@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2004 15:31:52 -0800
Cc: Chuq Von Rospach <chuqui@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/mail-ng/mail-archive/>
List-id: <mail-ng.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mail-ng-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <> <> <> <>
Sender: owner-mail-ng@xxxxxxxxxxxx

On Feb 1, 2004, at 1:55 PM, Doug Royer wrote:

Most (all?) IM systems require one or more hubs that track users
and setup the transfer for point to point or transfer all messages
through the hub. Not a practical model for email.

go study Jabber. MSN and AIM are not the be-all and end-all here.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Message Routing Philosophy - IM model
  - From: Doug Royer

References:
- Re: Message Routing Philosophy
  - From: william@xxxxxxxx
- Re: Message Routing Philosophy
  - From: James Craig Burley
- Re: Message Routing Philosophy
  - From: Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: Message Routing Philosophy - IM model
  - From: Doug Royer

Prev by Date: Re: a few short notes
Next by Date: Re: Message Routing Philosophy
Previous by thread: Re: Message Routing Philosophy - IM model
Next by thread: Re: Message Routing Philosophy - IM model
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread