[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: user-visible goals

To: mail-ng@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: user-visible goals
From: Charles Cazabon <imcngmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2004 14:37:23 -0600
In-reply-to: <>; from Doug@Royer.com on Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 12:56:29PM -0700
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/mail-ng/mail-archive/>
List-id: <mail-ng.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mail-ng-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
Mail-followup-to: mail-ng@imc.org
References: <> <> <> <> <> <>
Sender: owner-mail-ng@xxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i

Doug Royer <Doug@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Some do not like the REPLY-TO set, other like me feel then need it set.
> 
> Adding some kind of "if it is for the list  - reply to this emai address"
> or if it is for the person use this reply-to address. This may be more of
> a MUA than protocol issue. But it is a topic I have seen on several lists.

There's a standard for this; it's called Mail-Followup-To:.  See
http://cr.yp.to/proto/replyto.html and a bunch of other pages I don't have
time to dig up right now.

Charles
-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Charles Cazabon                        <imcngmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Follow-Ups:
- Re: user-visible goals
  - From: Doug Royer

References:
- Why are we here? What are our goals?
  - From: Nathaniel Borenstein
- Re: Why are we here? What are our goals?
  - From: Dave Crocker
- user-visible goals
  - From: Keith Moore
- Re: user-visible goals
  - From: Einar Stefferud
- Re: user-visible goals
  - From: Keith Moore
- Re: user-visible goals
  - From: Doug Royer

Prev by Date: Re: user-visible goals
Next by Date: RE: Why XML (was: Re: What I see as problems to solve ... and a strawman solution)
Previous by thread: Re: user-visible goals
Next by thread: Re: user-visible goals
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread