Re: Less is more

[Keith Moore <moore@xxxxxxxxxx>]

> 
> On Tue, 27 Apr 2004 14:40:13 -0400, Keith Moore <moore@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > I'm not sure what mail-ng could do to solve those problems while still
> > retaining a useful date field.
> 
> How about a single restricted format selected from the somewhat excessive  
> range offered by ISO8601 e.g. 2004-04-27T20:55:00+0100

I fail to see how specifying a different date format will stop people from
writing code that violates _that_ format.  It's not as if ISO8601 is 
significantly easier to either produce or parse than RFC 822 dates.

--
Regime change 2004 - better late than never.