Re: OT: Re: Less is more

[Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 7-feb-06, at 7:28, Frode Gill wrote:
   ^^^^^^^^

> As a little test, it would be interesting to see how many of the 
> mail-clients we use are able to parse the Date:-header in this 
> message, which as far as I can tell is perfectly legal according to 
> RFC2822.

Wow, this is insane:

Date: (Mon, (29)30 Feb 2004 \30:00\) THU (Wed, 28 Feb 2004 13:00) 
Friday \(Sat) 29 (=?iso-8859-15?Q?Feb?= ("or Mar")"?) Apr
 2004 17:
 (62)10:(:(:)\):)30 (Oslo, Norway) +2560

> (I know the mail client I am working on fails to parse it. Anyone get 
> their client to display 20040429 151030UTC?

AppleMail says: 29 februari 2560 10:30:00 GMT+01:00

Spamassassing really likes it too:

X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.6 required=5.0 
tests=BAYES_00,DATE_IN_PAST_96_XX,
	INVALID_DATE_TZ_ABSURD autolearn=no version=2.63