Archive of mail-ng, by thread

• encoding issues, was: What I see as problems to solve ... and a strawman solution, (continued)
  • encoding issues, was: What I see as problems to solve ... and a strawman solution, Iljitsch van Beijnum
    • Re: encoding issues, was: What I see as problems to solve ... and a strawman solution, Paul Crowley
  • Re: What I see as problems to solve ... and a strawman solution, Kai Henningsen
• Some basic questions and Voting Booth suggestion, Hector Santos
• Replacing SMTP Et Al, James Craig Burley
  • Re: Replacing SMTP Et Al, william@xxxxxxxx
  • Re: Replacing SMTP Et Al, Paul Robinson
    • Re: Replacing SMTP Et Al, James Craig Burley
• Traceable Quality of Service -> RE: Why are we here? What are our goals?, Paul Lambert
• Clarifying addressee roles, Bill McQuillan
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Clarifying addressee roles, Marc Alaia
• Delete all and replace is practical, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
  • Re: Delete all and replace is practical, Chuq Von Rospach
    • Re: Delete all and replace is practical, Einar Stefferud
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Delete all and replace is practical, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
    • Message Routing Philosophy, James Craig Burley
      • Re: Message Routing Philosophy, Paul Crowley
      • Re: Message Routing Philosophy, James Craig Burley
      • Re: Message Routing Philosophy, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: Message Routing Philosophy, James Craig Burley
      • Re: Message Routing Philosophy, william@xxxxxxxx
      • Re: Message Routing Philosophy, Chuq Von Rospach
      • Re: Message Routing Philosophy, Paul Crowley
      • Re: Message Routing Philosophy, James Craig Burley
      • Re: Message Routing Philosophy, Chuq Von Rospach
      • Re: Message Routing Philosophy - IM model, Doug Royer
      • Re: Message Routing Philosophy - IM model, Chuq Von Rospach
      • Re: Message Routing Philosophy - IM model, Doug Royer
      • Re: Message Routing Philosophy - IM model, Chuq Von Rospach
    • Message not available
      • RE: Delete all and replace is practical, Fred Baker
      • Re: Delete all and replace is practical, Keith Moore
      • Re: Delete all and replace is practical, Paul Smith
      • Re: Delete all and replace is practical, Keith Moore
      • Another goal: easier to configure software, Graham Klyne
  • Fwd: RE: Delete all and replace is practical, Einar Stefferud
  • Re: RE: Delete all and replace is practical, Dave Crocker
    • Re: Delete all and replace is practical, Chuq Von Rospach
      • don't design for Unix/Linux only (was: Re: Delete all and replace is practical), Martin Duerst
• RE: Some existing proposals for next-generation email, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
  • Re: Some existing proposals for next-generation email, Paul Crowley
    • Re: Some existing proposals for next-generation email, Paul Hoffman / IMC
      • Re: Some existing proposals for next-generation email, Len Sassaman
      • Re: Some existing proposals for next-generation email, Sam Roberts
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Some existing proposals for next-generation email, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Why are we here? What are our goals?, Nathaniel Borenstein
  • RE: Why are we here? What are our goals?, Jim Schaad
  • Re: Why are we here? What are our goals?, Keith Moore
    • Re: Why are we here? What are our goals?, James Craig Burley
  • Re: Why are we here? What are our goals?, Yakov Shafranovich
    • Re: Why are we here? What are our goals?, John W. Noerenberg II
      • Re: Why are we here? What are our goals?, Nathaniel Borenstein
    • [mail-ng] Anonimity and cost [was] Re: Why are we here? What are our goals?, Hector Santos
      • Re: [mail-ng] Anonimity and cost [was] Re: Why are we here? What are our goals?, Yakov Shafranovich
      • Re: [mail-ng] Anonimity and cost [was] Re: Why are we here? What are our goals?, Hector Santos
      • Re: [mail-ng] Anonimity and cost [was] Re: Why are we here? What are our goals?, Yakov Shafranovich
      • Re: [mail-ng] Anonimity and cost [was] Re: Why are we here? What are our goals?, Hector Santos
      • Re: [mail-ng] Anonimity and cost [was] Re: Why are we here? What are our goals?, Hector Santos
      • downgrading SMTP, J-F C. (Jefsey) Morfin
  • Re: Why are we here? What are our goals?, Eric A. Hall
  • Re: Why are we here? What are our goals?, Paul Crowley
  • Re: Why are we here? What are our goals?, Tex Texin
    • Re: Why are we here? What are our goals?, Yakov Shafranovich
      • Re: Why are we here? What are our goals?, Tex Texin
  • Re: Why are we here? What are our goals?, Hector Santos
    • Re: Why are we here? What are our goals?, Yakov Shafranovich
  • Re: Why are we here? What are our goals?, Florian Weimer
    • Re: Why are we here? What are our goals?, Eric A. Hall
    • Re: Why are we here? What are our goals?, Martin Duerst
  • Re: Why are we here? What are our goals?, Dave Crocker
    • User benefits of mail-ng, Paul Smith
    • Re: Why are we here? What are our goals?, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: Why are we here? What are our goals?, John W. Noerenberg II
      • Re: Why are we here? What are our goals?, Chuq Von Rospach
      • Message not available
      • Re: Why are we here? What are our goals?, Dave Crocker
      • Non-latin email addresses dangerous? (was: Re: Why are we here? What are our goals?), Martin Duerst
      • Re: Non-latin email addresses dangerous?, Doug Royer
      • Re: Non-latin email addresses dangerous?, Doug Royer
      • Re: Non-latin email addresses dangerous?, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: Non-latin email addresses dangerous?, Secretariat
      • Re: Why are we here? What are our goals?, James Craig Burley
    • user-visible goals, Keith Moore
      • Re: user-visible goals, william@xxxxxxxx
      • Re: user-visible goals, Chuq Von Rospach
      • Re: user-visible goals, Doug Royer
      • Re: user-visible goals, Paul Smith
      • Re: user-visible goals, Keith Moore
      • Re: user-visible goals, Chuq Von Rospach
      • Re: user-visible goals, Keith Moore
      • Re: user-visible goals, Hector Santos
      • Re: user-visible goals, william@xxxxxxxx
      • Re: user-visible goals, Paul Crowley
      • Re: user-visible goals, Martin Duerst
      • Re: user-visible goals, Keith Moore
      • Re: user-visible goals, Einar Stefferud
      • Re: user-visible goals, Keith Moore
      • Re: user-visible goals, Doug Royer
      • Re: user-visible goals, Charles Cazabon
      • Re: user-visible goals, Doug Royer
      • Re: user-visible goals, Dave Crocker
      • Re: user-visible goals, Arnt Gulbrandsen
      • Re: user-visible goals, Eric A. Hall
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Why are we here? What are our goals?, ipeter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Why are we here? What are our goals?, Keith Moore
  • RE: Why are we here? What are our goals?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
    • Re: Why are we here? What are our goals?, Paul Crowley
    • Re: Why are we here? What are our goals?, Eric A. Hall
  • RE: Why are we here? What are our goals?, Paul Lambert
    • Re: Why are we here? What are our goals?, Hector Santos
      • Re: Why are we here? What are our goals?, Florian Weimer
      • Re: Why are we here? What are our goals?, Hector Santos
      • Re: Why are we here? What are our goals?, Florian Weimer
      • Re: Why are we here? What are our goals?, Hector Santos
      • Re: Why are we here? What are our goals?, Paul Smith
      • Re: Why are we here? What are our goals?, Arnt Gulbrandsen
      • Re: Why are we here? What are our goals?, Chuq Von Rospach
      • Re: Why are we here? What are our goals?, Paul Smith
      • Re: Why are we here? What are our goals?, Florian Weimer
      • Re: Why are we here? What are our goals?, Paul Smith
      • Re: Why are we here? What are our goals?, Florian Weimer
      • Re: Why are we here? What are our goals?, Paul Crowley
      • Re: Why are we here? What are our goals?, Eric A. Hall
    • RE: Why are we here? What are our goals?, Len Sassaman
      • Re: Why are we here? What are our goals?, Hector Santos
      • Re: Why are we here? What are our goals?, Len Sassaman
      • Re: Why are we here? What are our goals?, Hector Santos
      • Re: Why are we here? What are our goals?, J C Lawrence
      • Re: Why are we here? What are our goals?, Hector Santos
      • Re: Why are we here? What are our goals?, J C Lawrence
      • Re: Why are we here? What are our goals?, Chuq Von Rospach
      • Re: Why are we here? What are our goals?, Len Sassaman
      • Re: Why are we here? What are our goals?, Adrian Hunsdon
      • Re: Why are we here? What are our goals?, James Craig Burley
      • Re: Why are we here? What are our goals?, Lyndon Nerenberg
      • Re: Why are we here? What are our goals?, Hector Santos
      • Re: Why are we here? What are our goals?, Einar Stefferud
      • Re: Why are we here? What are our goals?, Lyndon Nerenberg
    • Re: Why are we here? What are our goals?, Eric A. Hall
    • Re: Why are we here? What are our goals?, Chuq Von Rospach
      • Re: Why are we here? What are our goals?, Lyndon Nerenberg
      • Re: Why are we here? What are our goals?, Hector Santos
      • Re: Why are we here? What are our goals?, Chuq Von Rospach
      • Re: Why are we here? What are our goals?, Paul Crowley
      • Re: Why are we here? What are our goals?, Chuq Von Rospach
      • Re: Why are we here? What are our goals?, Paul Crowley
      • summary the discussion so far, James Seng
      • Re: summary the discussion so far, Paul Hoffman / IMC
      • Re: summary the discussion so far, James Seng
      • Re: summary the discussion so far, Jari Arkko
      • Re: summary the discussion so far, Paul Hoffman / IMC
      • Re: summary the discussion so far, Einar Stefferud
      • Re: summary the discussion so far, Paul Robinson
      • Re: summary the discussion so far, Paul Hoffman / IMC
      • "requirements documents" considered harmful, Keith Moore
      • Re: Why are we here? What are our goals?, J C Lawrence
      • Re: Why are we here? What are our goals?, James Craig Burley
      • Re: Why are we here? What are our goals?, Chuq Von Rospach
      • Re: Why are we here? What are our goals?, Eric A. Hall
      • Re: Why are we here? What are our goals?, Lyndon Nerenberg
      • Re: Why are we here? What are our goals?, Paul Smith
      • Re: Why are we here? What are our goals?, Hector Santos
      • Re: Why are we here? What are our goals?, Arnt Gulbrandsen
      • Re: Why are we here? What are our goals?, Martin Duerst
    • Re: Why are we here? What are our goals?, Paul Crowley
  • Re: Why are we here? What are our goals?, ipeter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • RE: Why are we here? What are our goals?, Steve Gardell
  • RE: Why are we here? What are our goals?, Paul Lambert
    • Re: Why are we here? What are our goals?, Eric A. Hall
  • Re: Why are we here? What are our goals?, Bonatti, Chris
    • Re: Why are we here? What are our goals?, Chuq Von Rospach
    • SMTP and multicasting, Jacob Palme
      • Re: SMTP and multicasting, Hector Santos
      • Re: SMTP and multicasting, Jacob Palme
      • RE: SMTP and multicasting, Bonatti, Chris
      • Re: SMTP and multicasting, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • mailbox format(s), Bruce Lilly
      • Re: mailbox format(s), Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: mailbox format(s), Guðbjörn S. Hreinsson
      • Re: mailbox format(s), J C Lawrence
      • Re: mailbox format(s), Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: mailbox format(s), Martin Duerst
      • Re: mailbox format(s), Bruce Lilly
      • Re: mailbox format(s), Brett Watson
      • Re: mailbox format(s), Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: mailbox format(s), Bruce Lilly
      • Re: mailbox format(s), Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: mailbox format(s), Bruce Lilly
      • Re: mailbox format(s), Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: mailbox format(s), Richard Welty
      • Goal: easier cpu parsable opt out tags, Doug Royer
      • Re: Goal: easier cpu parsable opt out tags, Brett Watson
      • Re: Goal: easier cpu parsable opt out tags, Doug Royer
      • Re: Goal: easier cpu parsable opt out tags, Dave Crocker
      • Re: Goal: easier cpu parsable opt out tags, Doug Royer
      • Re: Goal: easier cpu parsable opt out tags, Dave Crocker
      • Re: Goal: easier cpu parsable opt out tags, Doug Royer
      • Re: mailbox format(s), Bruce Lilly
      • Re: SMTP and multicasting, Hadmut Danisch
      • Re: SMTP and multicasting, Doug Royer
      • Re: SMTP and multicasting, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: SMTP and multicasting, Doug Royer
• RE: [mail-ng] Mailing List, Marc Alaia
  • Re: [mail-ng] Mailing List, Markus Gloede
    • Re: [mail-ng] Mailing List, J C Lawrence
      • Re: [mail-ng] Mailing List, Brad Clements
    • Re: [mail-ng] Mailing List, Alex van den Bogaerdt
    • Re: [mail-ng] Mailing List, Mark Davis
  • CLOSED: RE: [mail-ng] Mailing List, Paul Hoffman / IMC
    • [mail-ng+paul-answer] Mailing List, J-F C. (Jefsey) Morfin
  • Re: [mail-ng] Mailing List, Arnt Gulbrandsen
    • Re: [mail-ng] Mailing List, Wechsler
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [mail-ng] Mailing List, Marc Alaia
    • Re: [mail-ng] Mailing List, Charles Cazabon
  • RE: [mail-ng] Mailing List, Einar Stefferud
    • Re: [mail-ng] Mailing List, Alex van den Bogaerdt
    • Re: [mail-ng] Mailing List, Eric A. Hall
• Starting the mail-ng discussion, Paul Hoffman / IMC
  • Some existing proposals for next-generation email, Paul Crowley
    • Re: Some existing proposals for next-generation email, Yakov Shafranovich
      • Re: Some existing proposals for next-generation email, Paul Hoffman / IMC
    • Message not available
      • Re: [mail-ng]: Some existing proposals for next-generation email, J-F C. (Jefsey) Morfin
  • Setting the stage, Keith Moore
    • Re: Setting the stage, Michael Richardson
      • Re: Setting the stage, Jari Arkko
      • Re: Setting the stage, Paul Smith
      • Re: Setting the stage, Chuq Von Rospach
      • Re: Setting the stage, Paul Smith
      • Re: Setting the stage, Chuq Von Rospach
      • Re: Setting the stage, Paul Smith
      • Re: Setting the stage, Chuq Von Rospach
      • Re: Setting the stage, Hector Santos

The web site for this mailing list is sponsored by the Internet Mail Consortium. If you have any suggestions for additions or corrections to this Web page, please send them to phoffman@imc.org.