Re: Context sensitive encryption

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Jueneman@gte.com: "Re: features, use, deployment?"
• Previous message: Jueneman@gte.com: "Double posting"
• In reply to: Jueneman@gte.com: "Double posting"

On Feb 16, Dave Crocker <dcrocker@brandenburg.com> wrote:
> 	Does not this set of issues go away completely if PGP integrate
> fully with MIME, so that the fact that PGP content is MIME-based would be
> explicit and unambiguous?

Yes, it does go away.  My PGP/MIME draft is based on RFC1847, so what is
inside of an encrypted block is another MIME object.

me
--
Michael Elkins <elkins@aero.org>    http://www.cs.hmc.edu/~me/index.html
 PGP mail preferred.  Key availible via web or 'finger -l me@cs.hmc.edu'
   Key fingerprint = EB B1 68 32 3F B5 54 F9  6C AF 4E 94 5A EB 90 EC
     "I could be wasting my time more productively than this." --me

• Next message: Jueneman@gte.com: "Re: features, use, deployment?"
• Previous message: Jueneman@gte.com: "Double posting"
• In reply to: Jueneman@gte.com: "Double posting"