At 12:03 AM 2/25/96, Blake Ramsdell wrote:
> > I am not personally familiar with X.509 certificates, but
> > its pretty clear that v.1 is not something that I would likely
> > find acceptable.
>
> Why not?
I don't remember the details of the various problems that
were mentioned at the workshop, but they were enough to convince
me of this position.
-Brad