Re: CONSENSUS: Contenders Should Negotiate

James M. Galvin (galvin@eit.com)
Tue, 27 Feb 1996 17:52:34 -0400

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Previous message: James M. Galvin: "Re: IMAP vs. multipart/signed"
Maybe in reply to: Dave Crocker: "CONSENSUS: Contenders Should Negotiate"

How are we to accomplish this?  Who is the proponent of which contender and
why?  What is the criteria against which we should create a harmonized
protocol?

Perhaps this is obvious to someone who attended the last moment of the
meeting but it's not to me.

Jim

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
James M. Galvin                                               galvin@eit.com
VeriFone/EIT, PO Box 220, Glenwood, MD 21738                 +1 410.795.6882

Previous message: James M. Galvin: "Re: IMAP vs. multipart/signed"
Maybe in reply to: Dave Crocker: "CONSENSUS: Contenders Should Negotiate"