Re: SCrocker's ASN.1 comments

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Previous message: Brad Knowles: "Re: IMAP vs. multipart/signed"
• In reply to: Dave Crocker: "SCrocker's ASN.1 comments"

  I'd be curious to hear why the infinitely more human-readable
  augmented Backus-Naur Form (BNF) isn't mentioned in these debates.
  How does it fits in.  Is it a "standard" with regard to IETF
  documents?
  
  Just reply to me to spare the list from extending these wars.  I'll
  summarize if the demand requires.

Bill Wohler <wohler@newt.com>   ph: +1-415-854-1857  fax: +1-415-854-3195
Say it with MIME.  Maintainer of comp.mail.mh and news.software.nn FAQs.
If you're passed on the right, you're in the wrong lane.

• Previous message: Brad Knowles: "Re: IMAP vs. multipart/signed"
• In reply to: Dave Crocker: "SCrocker's ASN.1 comments"