resolving-security mailing list by author

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ]

Starting: Mon 29 Jan 1996 - 09:27:32 PDT
Ending: Sat 07 Jun 1997 - 03:49:13 PDT
Messages: 413

• A. Padgett Peterson P.E. Information Security
  • RE: Sad situation!!! Thu, 3 Oct 1996 8:31:14 -0400 (EDT)
  • Quantum Ecomomics Tue, 19 Mar 1996 21:15:37 -0500 (EST)
  • What is crypto Sat, 16 Mar 1996 8:08:55 -0500 (EST)
  • Quantum Economics Fri, 15 Mar 1996 21:00:13 -0500 (EST)
  • Types of security (was re states...) Tue, 5 Mar 1996 23:34:21 -0500 (EST)
  • re: Security problems Mon, 4 Mar 1996 18:44:25 -0500 (EST)
  • States and the 8 bit dilemma Thu, 29 Feb 1996 14:09:03 -0500 (EST)
  • Acronyms Sun, 25 Feb 1996 11:37:54 -0500 (EST)
  • Recursive operations Sun, 25 Feb 1996 11:32:39 -0500 (EST)
  • Unfortunately... Wed, 21 Feb 1996 11:02:53 -0500 (EST)
  • ? Thu, 15 Feb 1996 21:44:30 -0500 (EST)
  • Context sensitive encryption Thu, 15 Feb 1996 13:36:06 -0500 (EST)
• Alex Deacon
  • IA5 String... Fri, 23 Feb 1996 14:51:25 -0800
• Anonymous
  • Re: Context sensitive encryption Thu, 15 Feb 1996 14:21:03 -0600
• Barton E. Schaefer
  • Re: using application/octet-stream in multipart/encrypted Thu, 7 Mar 1996 11:23:01 -0800
  • Re: the 8-bit dilemma Wed, 6 Mar 1996 14:57:34 -0800
  • Re: Security Problems Wed, 6 Mar 1996 10:18:26 -0800
  • Re: Security Problems Tue, 5 Mar 1996 18:06:36 -0800
  • Re: States and the 8 bit dilemma Tue, 5 Mar 1996 17:11:53 -0800
  • Re: Security Problems Mon, 4 Mar 1996 09:59:50 -0800
  • Re: States and the 8 bit dilemma Thu, 29 Feb 1996 11:57:39 -0800
  • Re: the 8-bit dilemma Wed, 28 Feb 1996 16:20:27 -0800
  • Re: the 8-bit dilemma Mon, 26 Feb 1996 17:24:20 -0800
• Bill Wohler
  • Re: worldtalk.com MX records Wed, 27 Mar 1996 09:11:54 -0800
  • worldtalk.com MX records Wed, 27 Mar 1996 08:33:10 -0800
  • Re: using application/octet-stream in multipart/encrypted Thu, 07 Mar 1996 11:19:07 -0800
  • Re: SCrocker's ASN.1 comments Thu, 29 Feb 1996 16:58:52 -0800
  • Re: IMAP vs. multipart/signed Tue, 27 Feb 1996 16:56:14 -0800
  • Re: Acronyms Mon, 26 Feb 1996 10:27:38 -0800
  • Re: IA5 String... Fri, 23 Feb 1996 15:10:31 -0800
  • Electronic Messaging Association: *Press Release* '88 X.400 Challenge Thu, 22 Feb 1996 22:28:45 -0800
  • Use of multipart/encrypted Thu, 22 Feb 1996 14:57:00 -0800
  • Re: V1 vs. V3 certificate usage Thu, 22 Feb 1996 11:35:11 -0800
  • Re: Problems with MSP Thu, 15 Feb 1996 12:09:20 -0800
• Blake Ramsdell
  • FW: MIME Security with PGP Tue, 23 Apr 1996 14:55:09 -0700
  • RE: Clarifying controversial criteria Thu, 14 Mar 1996 03:37:00 -0800
  • RE: Clarifying controversial criteria Thu, 14 Mar 1996 00:48:33 -0800
  • RE: Clarifying controversial criteria Wed, 13 Mar 1996 14:46:09 -0800
  • RE: Clarifying controversial criteria Tue, 12 Mar 1996 15:10:33 -0800
  • RE: using application/octet-stream in multipart/encrypted Thu, 7 Mar 96 20:41:22 UT
  • RE: RE: [ Death of MOSS? ] Wed, 28 Feb 96 03:45:52 UT
  • RE: IMAP vs. multipart/signed Wed, 28 Feb 96 01:50:53 UT
  • (no subject) Wed, 28 Feb 96 00:19:20 UT
  • (no subject) Wed, 28 Feb 96 00:16:51 UT
  • RE: Consensus??: Common Certificate Formats Sun, 25 Feb 96 05:03:08 UT
  • RE: Meeting Agenda Wed, 14 Feb 96 18:47:51 UT
  • RE: Meeting Agenda Tue, 13 Feb 96 17:25:02 UT
• Bob Dickinson
  • Is S/MIME Secure? Fri, 15 Mar 1996 17:34:52 -0800
• Brad Knowles
  • Re: Sad situation!!! -Reply -Reply Thu, 3 Oct 1996 13:49:25 -0400
  • http://www.clark.net/pub/cme/spki.txt Tue, 13 Aug 1996 23:18:54 -0400
  • Re: No joy in Mudville... Wed, 24 Apr 1996 10:58:46 -0400
  • No joy in Mudville... Wed, 24 Apr 1996 04:23:12 -0500
  • Re: Is S/MIME Secure? Sat, 16 Mar 1996 01:25:02 -0500
  • Re: Re[2]: Clarifying controversial criteria Fri, 15 Mar 1996 18:17:15 -0500
  • Re: Clarifying controversial criteria Thu, 14 Mar 1996 23:17:18 -0500
  • Re: Clarifying controversial criteria Wed, 13 Mar 1996 20:29:27 -0500
  • Re: Draft of workshop notes Tue, 12 Mar 1996 16:21:08 -0500
  • Re: Security Problems Thu, 7 Mar 1996 03:22:34 -0500
  • Re: Security Problems Thu, 7 Mar 1996 03:22:29 -0500
  • Re: Draft of workshop notes Wed, 6 Mar 1996 23:21:07 -0500
  • Re: Draft of workshop notes Wed, 6 Mar 1996 14:29:22 -0500
  • Re: Security Problems Wed, 6 Mar 1996 05:39:45 -0500
  • Re: Security Problems Wed, 6 Mar 1996 05:39:39 -0500
  • Re: Draft of workshop notes Wed, 6 Mar 1996 04:58:58 -0500
  • Re: Security Problems Wed, 6 Mar 1996 04:58:40 -0500
  • Re: Security Problems Tue, 5 Mar 1996 19:50:51 -0500
  • Re: Security Problems Tue, 5 Mar 1996 01:27:57 -0500
  • Re: Security Problems Tue, 5 Mar 1996 01:27:46 -0500
  • Re: Security Problems Tue, 5 Mar 1996 01:27:52 -0500
  • Re: Security Problems Mon, 4 Mar 1996 17:19:45 -0500
  • Re: Security Problems Mon, 4 Mar 1996 14:30:03 -0500
  • Re: States and the 8 bit dilemma Thu, 29 Feb 1996 20:44:07 -0500
  • Re: IMAP vs. multipart/signed Thu, 29 Feb 1996 19:59:59 -0500
  • Re: the 8-bit dilemma Wed, 28 Feb 1996 20:32:55 -0500
  • Re: the 8-bit dilemma Wed, 28 Feb 1996 20:14:45 -0500
  • Re: the 8-bit dilemma Wed, 28 Feb 1996 19:22:29 -0500
  • (no subject) Wed, 28 Feb 1996 07:36:06 -0500
  • Re: CONSENSUS: Contenders Should Negotiate Wed, 28 Feb 1996 07:35:52 -0500
  • Re: RE: [ Death of MOSS? ] Tue, 27 Feb 1996 23:44:49 -0500
  • Re: the 8-bit dilemma Mon, 26 Feb 1996 19:48:15 -0500
  • Re: [No subject] Mon, 26 Feb 1996 19:39:24 -0500
  • Re: IMC outcome: Is MOSS dead? Mon, 26 Feb 1996 19:28:13 -0500
  • Re: IA5 String... Mon, 26 Feb 1996 12:19:48 -0500
  • RE: Consensus??: Common Certificate Formats Sun, 25 Feb 1996 06:09:25 -0500
  • Re: A brief comparison of email encryption protocols Sun, 25 Feb 1996 02:02:03 -0500
  • Re: Consensus??: Common Certificate Formats Sun, 25 Feb 1996 00:39:44 -0500
  • Re: IMAP vs. multipart/signed Sun, 25 Feb 1996 00:40:02 -0500
  • Re: IMAP vs. multipart/signed Sun, 25 Feb 1996 00:39:55 -0500
  • Re: MSP with MIME technique Internet Draft available Fri, 23 Feb 1996 05:25:10 -0500
  • (no subject) Fri, 23 Feb 1996 05:13:56 -0500
  • Re: A brief comparison of email encryption protocols Fri, 23 Feb 1996 05:13:51 -0500
  • Re: A brief comparison of email encryption protocols Fri, 23 Feb 1996 03:56:44 -0500
  • Re: V1 vs. V3 certificate usage Fri, 23 Feb 1996 03:56:36 -0500
  • Thursday evening quarterbacking... Fri, 23 Feb 1996 03:55:50 -0500
  • New acronym/term... Fri, 23 Feb 1996 03:55:58 -0500
  • Signing entire messages... Fri, 23 Feb 1996 03:55:54 -0500
  • Admission price... Tue, 20 Feb 1996 00:24:15 -0500
• c.robbins
  • Re: Problems with MSP Fri, 16 Feb 1996 09:42:12 +0000
• carlisle
  • re:Signing and Encrypting Wed, 28 Feb 1996 17:47:00 -0500
• Dave Crocker
  • Re: Identity of the sender Mon, 29 Apr 1996 07:28:27 -0700
  • Re: MIME Security with PGP Thu, 25 Apr 1996 17:14:55 -0700
  • Re: MIME Security with PGP Thu, 25 Apr 1996 14:36:50 -0700
  • Re: No joy in Mudville... Wed, 24 Apr 1996 11:37:59 -0700
  • Re: No joy in Mudville... Wed, 24 Apr 1996 07:01:53 -0700
  • Email Security Workshop lack of followup Tue, 16 Apr 1996 07:47:04 -0700
  • Re: Draft of workshop notes Wed, 6 Mar 1996 15:19:39 -0800
  • Re: Draft of workshop notes Wed, 6 Mar 1996 08:39:03 -0800
  • Re: States and the 8 bit dilemma Tue, 5 Mar 1996 14:42:28 -0800
  • SCrocker's ASN.1 comments Thu, 29 Feb 1996 15:37:46 -0800
  • Re: IMAP vs. multipart/signed Thu, 29 Feb 1996 09:21:14 -0800
  • Re: IMAP vs. multipart/signed Wed, 28 Feb 1996 08:29:23 -0800
  • Re: CONSENSUS: Contenders Should Negotiate Wed, 28 Feb 1996 08:22:06 -0800
  • Re: [No Subject Given] Mon, 26 Feb 1996 22:11:33 -0800
  • Re: IMC outcome: Is MOSS dead? Mon, 26 Feb 1996 11:37:13 -0800
  • Re: New acronym/term... Mon, 26 Feb 1996 08:20:02 -0800
  • Re: New acronym/term... Sat, 24 Feb 1996 11:12:25 -0800
  • Re: IMAP vs. multipart/signed Sat, 24 Feb 1996 09:43:34 -0800
  • Consensus??: Common Certificate Formats Sat, 24 Feb 1996 09:38:13 -0800
  • Very Rough Consensus: Use Multipart/Encrypted (properly) Sat, 24 Feb 1996 09:35:28 -0800
  • CONSENSUS: Contenders Should Negotiate Sat, 24 Feb 1996 09:20:32 -0800
  • STRONG CONSENSUS: Use Multipart/Signed Sat, 24 Feb 1996 09:00:45 -0800
  • Re: New acronym/term... Sat, 24 Feb 1996 08:15:20 -0800
  • Thursday morning quarterbacking... Thu, 22 Feb 1996 13:02:33 -0800
  • Re: Context sensitive encryption Fri, 16 Feb 1996 08:12:22 -0800
  • features, use, deployment? Fri, 16 Feb 1996 08:25:58 -0800
  • ADMIN: Anonymous mail and the handling of flamage Fri, 16 Feb 1996 08:11:10 -0800
  • Re: Problems with MSP Wed, 14 Feb 1996 22:13:48 -0800
  • RE: Meeting Agenda Wed, 14 Feb 1996 11:37:03 -0800
  • Re: Meeting Agenda Tue, 13 Feb 1996 21:28:36 -0800
  • RE: Meeting Agenda Tue, 13 Feb 1996 18:46:58 -0800
  • RE: Meeting Agenda Tue, 13 Feb 1996 14:55:51 -0800
  • Meeting Agenda Mon, 12 Feb 1996 21:05:56 -0800
  • re: Message Security Protocol Thu, 8 Feb 1996 20:33:07 -0800
  • Re: Message Security Protocol Thu, 8 Feb 1996 13:21:07 -0800
  • attendees Mon, 5 Feb 1996 16:03:28 -0800
  • Reviewing the IMC workshop agenda Mon, 5 Feb 1996 10:33:22 -0800
  • Greetings Mon, 29 Jan 1996 11:20:11 -0800
• Dave Darnell
  • RE: Sad situation!!! Thu, 03 Oct 1996 07:55:48 -0600
  • Re: Re[2]: Sad situation!!! Thu, 03 Oct 1996 07:11:23 -0600
  • Re: Re[2]: Sad situation!!! Wed, 02 Oct 1996 12:33:48 -0600
  • Re: Sad situation!!! Wed, 02 Oct 1996 06:39:22 -0600
  • Re: Comments on IETF-EDIINT security decision matrix Tue, 04 Jun 1996 15:42:51 -0700
• Dave Del Torto
  • The Zimmermann Telegram Mon, 31 Mar 1997 11:59:49 -0800
• dcrocker@brandenburg.com
  • Re: MIME Security with PGP Thu, 25 Apr 1996 14:55:20 -0700
  • Re: MIME Security with PGP Thu, 25 Apr 1996 14:55:20 -0700
• Derek Atkins
  • Re: MIME Security with PGP Thu, 25 Apr 1996 13:38:01 EDT
  • Re: the 8-bit dilemma Fri, 01 Mar 1996 11:30:25 EST
  • Re: the 8-bit dilemma Thu, 29 Feb 1996 12:17:34 EST
  • Re: the 8-bit dilemma Thu, 29 Feb 1996 12:02:06 EST
• distribution-request@sevenlocks.com
  • distribution Digest - V01 #02 Fri, 16 Aug 1996 00:01:50 Eastern Daylight Time
• Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
  • Re: Quantum Economics Tue, 19 Mar 1996 11:56:41 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: Security Problems Fri, 15 Mar 1996 16:09:28 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: Clarifying controversial criteria Fri, 15 Mar 1996 10:12:22 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: A brief comparison of email encryption protocols Tue, 20 Feb 1996 10:40:54 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: Problems with MSP Tue, 20 Feb 1996 10:21:28 -0500 (EST)
  • DNS Keys (was A brief comparison of email encryption protocols) Thu, 15 Feb 1996 17:14:10 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: Context sensitive encryption Thu, 15 Feb 1996 15:32:28 -0500 (EST)
• E. Peter McKinney, CA
  • RE: Sad situation!!! Thu, 10 Oct 1996 11:11:19 -0400
• Edward A. Russell
  • RE: the 8-bit dilemma Wed, 28 Feb 1996 16:34:58 -0500
  • RE: the 8-bit dilemma Wed, 28 Feb 1996 10:11:26 -0500
  • RE: Context sensitive encryption Fri, 16 Feb 1996 15:44:45 -0500
• Edward Russell
  • RE: Sad situation!!! -Reply Thu, 03 Oct 1996 12:11:06 -0400
• Einar Stefferud
  • Re: MOSS vs. S/MIME vs. PGP/MIME Matrix Fri, 07 Jun 1996 13:08:42 -0700
  • Re: Identity of the sender Tue, 30 Apr 1996 00:26:05 -0700
  • Re: MIME Security with PGP Thu, 25 Apr 1996 08:31:44 -0700
  • Re: MIME with MSP comments Tue, 26 Mar 1996 20:28:41 -0800
• Francisco Jordan
  • X509 v3, CRL v2, PKCS# & SET Tue, 23 Jul 1996 13:46:39 +0200
  • ASN1, X509 CertV3, CRLV2, PKCS, ... Mon, 08 Jul 1996 12:08:06 +0200
• Frederik H. Andersen
  • Sad situation!!! Wed, 02 Oct 1996 11:04:03 +0200
• Gary Gerlach
  • RE: Sad situation!!! Mon, 7 Oct 1996 22:08:59 -0700
  • RE: Sad situation!!! Mon, 7 Oct 1996 22:12:18 -0700
• geoff klein
  • Pronto Secure - a mail package that integrates PGP. Wed, 14 Feb 96 13:25:48 IST
• Graham Finlayson
  • Re: IA5 String... Mon, 26 Feb 1996 10:26:26 +0000
• Harald.T.Alvestrand@uninett.no
  • Re: Sad situation!!! Wed, 02 Oct 1996 14:27:55 +0200
  • Re: RFC-1847 parameter addition for content-type Thu, 04 Jul 1996 09:42:26 +0200
  • Re: A brief comparison of email encryption protocols Tue, 20 Feb 1996 10:08:31 +0100
• Housley, Russ
  • MIME Security with PGP Thu, 25 Apr 96 06:46:54
  • Re[2]: IMAP vs. multipart/signed Tue, 19 Mar 96 13:55:17
  • Draft Minutes of MSP MIME BOF Mon, 18 Mar 96 10:08:38
  • Re: Draft of workshop notes Tue, 12 Mar 96 11:41:50
  • Re: Security Problems Tue, 12 Mar 96 11:42:13
  • Re: Draft of workshop notes Thu, 07 Mar 96 16:45:10
  • Re[2]: States and the 8 bit dilemma Tue, 05 Mar 96 14:21:52
  • Re: carrying certificates Tue, 05 Mar 96 14:21:34
  • Re: the 8-bit dilemma Thu, 29 Feb 96 13:18:03
  • Re: [ Death of MOSS? ] Thu, 29 Feb 96 13:17:53
  • (no subject) Wed, 28 Feb 96 20:20:48
  • Re: the 8-bit dilemma Wed, 28 Feb 96 20:20:38
  • Re: [No Subject Given] Mon, 26 Feb 96 20:46:39
  • Re: A brief comparison of email encryption protocols Mon, 26 Feb 96 20:46:43
  • Re: [No subject] Mon, 26 Feb 96 10:05:55
  • Re: A brief comparison of email encryption protocols Tue, 20 Feb 96 17:38:53
  • Re: A brief comparison of email encryption protocols Tue, 20 Feb 96 17:38:59
  • Re: A brief comparison of email encryption protocols Mon, 19 Feb 96 17:31:40
  • Re: Problems with MSP Mon, 19 Feb 96 17:31:30
  • Re: Problems with MSP Mon, 19 Feb 96 17:31:15
  • Re: Problems with MSP Mon, 19 Feb 96 17:31:25
  • Re: Problems with MSP (not) Fri, 16 Feb 96 06:14:46
  • Re: Problems with MSP Thu, 15 Feb 96 14:19:56
  • Re: Message Security Protocol Fri, 09 Feb 96 17:32:38
  • Message Security Protocol Thu, 08 Feb 96 12:33:33
• Hunt, Sonya R.
  • RE: LDAP Thu, 25 Jul 96 14:47:00 PDT
• Ian Duncan
  • Re: MIME Security with PGP Thu, 2 May 1996 10:59:22 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: MIME Security with PGP Tue, 30 Apr 1996 13:01:24 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: MIME Security with PGP Thu, 25 Apr 1996 15:35:27 -0400 (EDT)
• Jack Oswald
  • Re: Sad situation!!! -Reply -Reply -Reply Thu, 03 Oct 1996 21:42:56 -0800
  • Re: Sad situation!!! -Reply -Reply -Reply Thu, 03 Oct 1996 21:45:09 -0800
  • Re: Sad situation!!! -Reply -Reply Thu, 03 Oct 1996 09:01:14 -0800
  • Sad situation!!! -Reply Wed, 02 Oct 1996 16:24:01 -0800
  • Sad situation!!! -Reply Wed, 02 Oct 1996 16:21:41 -0800
• James M. Galvin
  • Re: [ Death of MOSS? ] Fri, 1 Mar 1996 11:19:21 -0400
  • Re: IMAP vs. multipart/signed Fri, 1 Mar 1996 11:20:03 -0400
  • Re: the 8-bit dilemma Fri, 1 Mar 1996 11:18:40 -0400
  • Re: IMAP vs. multipart/signed Thu, 29 Feb 1996 09:58:25 -0400
  • Re: the 8-bit dilemma Thu, 29 Feb 1996 09:58:17 -0400
  • Re: IMAP vs. multipart/signed Wed, 28 Feb 1996 09:49:44 -0400
  • Re: RE: [ Death of MOSS? ] Wed, 28 Feb 1996 09:44:17 -0400
  • (no subject) Wed, 28 Feb 1996 09:43:55 -0400
  • (no subject) Wed, 28 Feb 1996 09:43:38 -0400
  • Re: IMAP vs. multipart/signed Wed, 28 Feb 1996 09:44:02 -0400
  • Re: CONSENSUS: Contenders Should Negotiate Tue, 27 Feb 1996 17:52:34 -0400
  • Re: IMAP vs. multipart/signed Tue, 27 Feb 1996 17:52:11 -0400
  • Re: IMAP vs. multipart/signed Tue, 27 Feb 1996 17:52:02 -0400
  • Re: Regarding consensus on Multipart/Signed Tue, 27 Feb 1996 17:52:40 -0400
  • (no subject) Tue, 27 Feb 1996 17:52:26 -0400
  • Re: IMAP vs. multipart/signed Tue, 27 Feb 1996 17:51:53 -0400
  • Re: A brief comparison of email encryption protocols Fri, 23 Feb 1996 04:45:26 -0400
  • Re: A brief comparison of email encryption protocols Thu, 15 Feb 1996 09:45:50 -0400
• Jim Reitz
  • RE: using application/octet-stream in multipart/encrypted Fri, 8 Mar 1996 10:38:23 -0800
• John Marchioni
  • RE: Consensus??: Common Certificate Formats Mon, 26 Feb 1996 09:36:07 -0800 (PST)
• Jojo Mundackal
  • RE: Meeting Agenda Wed, 14 Feb 1996 15:53:50 +1000 (EST)
• Jonathan Zamick
  • (no subject) Wed, 28 Feb 1996 21:52:18 -0800
• Jueneman@gte.com
  • Re: using application/octet-stream in multipart/encrypted Thu, 07 Mar 1996 14:27:28 EST
  • Re: the 8-bit dilemma Wed, 06 Mar 1996 15:48:50 EST
  • MIME is a complex object description, not a transport protocol (Was: Re: the 8-bit dilemma) Thu, 29 Feb 1996 13:23:44 EST
  • Re: the 8-bit dilemma Wed, 28 Feb 1996 10:55:52 EST
  • Re: the 8-bit dilemma Tue, 27 Feb 1996 16:04:01 EST
  • Re: the 8-bit dilemma Tue, 27 Feb 1996 16:08:09 EST
  • Re: the 8-bit dilemma Tue, 27 Feb 1996 16:04:01 EST
  • Re: IA5 String... Mon, 26 Feb 1996 14:50:10 EST
  • Re: New acronym/term... Mon, 26 Feb 1996 12:41:02 EST
  • Re: IA5 String... Mon, 26 Feb 1996 11:12:26 EST
  • Re: V1 vs. V3 certificate usage Thu, 22 Feb 1996 20:05:01 EST
  • Re: A brief comparison of email encryption protocols Thu, 22 Feb 1996 17:25:18 EST
  • V1 vs. V3 certificate usage Tue, 20 Feb 1996 23:34:07 EST
  • Re: A brief comparison of email encryption protocols Tue, 20 Feb 1996 09:45:09 EST
  • Re: features, use, deployment? Fri, 16 Feb 1996 14:42:48 EST
  • Double posting Fri, 16 Feb 1996 14:00:26 EST
  • RE: Meeting Agenda Tue, 13 Feb 1996 19:40:28 EST
• Keith Moore
  • Re: Sad situation!!! -Reply -Reply Thu, 03 Oct 1996 13:05:22 -0400
• Kevin Wanner
  • Re: Sad situation!!! -Reply -Reply 3 Oct 96 12:40:39
• KURN_DAVID@Tandem.COM
  • Signing and Encrypting 28 Feb 96 07:55:00 -0800
  • IMC outcome: Is MOSS dead? 26 Feb 96 10:48:00 -0800
• Laurence Lundblade
  • RFC-1847 parameter addition for content-type Wed, 3 Jul 1996 11:56:32 -0700
  • Re: the 8-bit dilemma Thu, 29 Feb 1996 08:42:41 -0800
  • Re: A brief comparison of email encryption protocols Fri, 16 Feb 1996 17:02:56 -0800
• Marianne Mueller
  • Re: http://www.clark.net/pub/cme/spki.txt Tue, 13 Aug 1996 22:47:28 -0700
  • Re: New acronym/term... Mon, 26 Feb 1996 09:41:06 -0800
• Mark Crispin
  • Re: IMAP vs. multipart/signed Sat, 24 Feb 1996 12:54:51 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: IMAP vs. multipart/signed Sat, 24 Feb 1996 10:42:54 -0800 (PST)
• Mark S Feldman
  • Re: Security Problems Tue, 05 Mar 1996 09:59:44 -0500
  • Re: A brief comparison of email encryption protocols Thu, 22 Feb 1996 18:49:55 -0500
  • Re: A brief comparison of email encryption protocols Thu, 22 Feb 1996 14:18:40 -0500
  • Re: A brief comparison of email encryption protocols Wed, 21 Feb 1996 10:11:43 -0500
• Michael Elkins
  • Re: Identity of the sender Fri, 26 Apr 1996 16:47:21 -0700
  • using application/octet-stream in multipart/encrypted Thu, 7 Mar 1996 10:03:24 -0800
  • Re: Security Problems Wed, 6 Mar 1996 13:14:44 -0800
  • Re: Security Problems Mon, 4 Mar 1996 09:14:46 -0800
  • RE: the 8-bit dilemma Wed, 28 Feb 1996 14:21:21 -0800
  • Re: IMAP vs. multipart/signed Wed, 28 Feb 1996 10:05:09 -0800
  • RE: the 8-bit dilemma Wed, 28 Feb 1996 09:45:55 -0800
  • Re: the 8-bit dilemma Tue, 27 Feb 1996 14:21:26 -0800
  • the 8-bit dilemma Mon, 26 Feb 1996 15:29:04 -0800
  • RE: Context sensitive encryption Fri, 16 Feb 1996 12:57:25 -0800
  • Re: Context sensitive encryption Fri, 16 Feb 1996 11:16:34 -0800
• michel
  • RE: Sad situation!!! Thu, 3 Oct 1996 16:53:50 -0400
  • RE: Sad situation!!! Thu, 3 Oct 1996 10:16:11 -0400
  • RE: Sad situation!!! Wed, 2 Oct 1996 11:54:51 -0400
  • re: A brief comparison of email encryption protocols Wed, 21 Feb 1996 00:46:00 -0500
  • re: Message Security Protocol Thu, 8 Feb 1996 22:33:00 -0500
• Myers Michael
  • Reviewing the IMC workshop agenda Mon, 05 Feb 96 16:35:00 MST
• Nathaniel Borenstein
  • Re: FW: MIME Security with PGP Fri, 26 Apr 1996 16:20:17 -0400 (GMT)
  • Re: FW: MIME Security with PGP Fri, 26 Apr 1996 16:20:17 -0400 (GMT)
  • Re: IMAP vs. multipart/signed Thu, 29 Feb 1996 06:11:50 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: New acronym/term... Mon, 26 Feb 1996 07:38:40 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: Regarding consensus on Multipart/Signed Mon, 26 Feb 1996 06:35:22 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: Regarding consensus on Multipart/Signed Sun, 25 Feb 1996 10:49:38 -0500 (EST)
  • Timestamping: A Clarification Fri, 23 Feb 1996 11:43:38 -0500 (EST)
• Ned Freed
  • Re: Sad situation!!! -Reply -Reply Thu, 03 Oct 1996 11:09:32 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: Sad situation!!! -Reply Thu, 03 Oct 1996 10:10:08 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: RFC-1847 parameter addition for content-type Thu, 04 Jul 1996 11:06:28 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: MIME Security with PGP Thu, 25 Apr 1996 16:33:48 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: MIME with MSP comments Tue, 26 Mar 1996 01:33:14 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: the 8-bit dilemma Wed, 06 Mar 1996 13:50:25 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: the 8-bit dilemma Sun, 03 Mar 1996 12:09:07 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: the 8-bit dilemma Sat, 02 Mar 1996 14:17:55 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: A brief comparison of email encryption protocols Sun, 25 Feb 1996 08:49:02 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: A brief comparison of email encryption protocols Sat, 24 Feb 1996 21:12:47 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: A brief comparison of email encryption protocols (correction) Wed, 21 Feb 1996 00:14:47 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: A brief comparison of email encryption protocols Tue, 20 Feb 1996 23:29:47 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: A brief comparison of email encryption protocols Tue, 20 Feb 1996 23:12:55 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: A brief comparison of email encryption protocols Mon, 19 Feb 1996 19:09:24 -0800 (PST)
• Nick Pope
  • network security products Mon, 5 Feb 1996 13:38:24 +0000
• Nicolls, J. Weston
  • LDAP Thu, 25 Jul 96 11:26:00 PDT
  • Mail List Announcement for "MIME-MSP" Mon, 25 Mar 96 14:14:00 PST
  • RE: Draft of workshop notes Tue, 12 Mar 96 13:25:00 PST
  • Re: MIME with MSP comments Tue, 05 Mar 96 15:59:00 PST
• Paul E. Hoffman
  • Two new secure Internet mail BOFs Mon, 16 Dec 1996 18:06:39 -0800
  • Workshop notes Mon, 11 Mar 1996 09:43:14 -0800
  • Re: New acronym/term... Mon, 26 Feb 1996 08:27:29 -0800
  • IMC Workshop press release Sat, 24 Feb 1996 14:28:52 -0800
  • Re: New acronym/term... Sat, 24 Feb 1996 11:44:51 -0800
  • Arriving on Wednesday Mon, 19 Feb 1996 15:44:05 -0800
  • Re: Problems with MSP Fri, 16 Feb 1996 20:16:36 -0800
  • Re: Message Security Protocol Tue, 13 Feb 1996 15:23:19 -0800
  • Re: Message Security Protocol Fri, 9 Feb 1996 10:06:23 -0800
• Paul Rarey
  • Re: ? Fri, 16 Feb 1996 07:21:14 -0700
  • Re: Problems with MSP Thu, 15 Feb 1996 17:26:49 -0700
  • Re: Pronto Secure - a mail package that integrates PGP. Wed, 14 Feb 1996 14:46:04 -0700
  • Re: Meeting Agenda Wed, 14 Feb 1996 10:20:43 -0700
  • Comments on Meeting Agenda Tue, 6 Feb 1996 14:17:43 -0700
• Perry E. Metzger
  • Re: IETF-W3C Interaction? Mon, 04 Nov 1996 14:26:00 -0500
  • Re: MIME Security with PGP Thu, 25 Apr 1996 11:14:00 -0400
  • Re: Quantum Ecomomics Tue, 19 Mar 1996 23:05:05 -0500
  • Re: Quantum Economics Sat, 16 Mar 1996 18:01:38 -0500
  • Re: Re[2]: Clarifying controversial criteria Sat, 16 Mar 1996 17:27:52 -0500
  • Re: Re[2]: Clarifying controversial criteria Fri, 15 Mar 1996 16:38:41 -0500
• Randy Catoe
  • RE: Consensus??: Common Certificate Formats Sun, 25 Feb 1996 05:35:36 -0500
• Raph Levien
  • Re: Comments on IETF-EDIINT security decision matrix Wed, 05 Jun 1996 09:01:43 -0400
  • Comments on IETF-EDIINT security decision matrix Tue, 04 Jun 1996 12:14:21 -0400
  • Re: MIME Security with PGP Wed, 01 May 1996 13:52:51 -0700
  • Re: Identity of the sender Sat, 27 Apr 1996 15:32:07 -0700
  • Re: Identity of the sender Sat, 27 Apr 1996 15:32:07 -0700
  • Re: FW: MIME Security with PGP Tue, 23 Apr 1996 18:32:34 -0700
  • Re: Is S/MIME Secure? Fri, 15 Mar 1996 21:16:21 -0800
  • resolving-security mailing list: Re[2]: Clarifying controversial criteria Fri, 15 Mar 1996 13:56:58 -0800
  • Re: Clarifying controversial criteria Thu, 14 Mar 1996 12:23:40 -0800
  • RE: Clarifying controversial criteria Wed, 13 Mar 1996 17:21:30 -0800
  • RE: Clarifying controversial criteria Wed, 13 Mar 1996 12:48:25 -0800
  • Clarifying controversial criteria Tue, 12 Mar 1996 13:04:54 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: Draft of workshop notes Thu, 07 Mar 1996 17:43:42 -0800
  • Re: Draft of workshop notes Wed, 06 Mar 1996 09:05:05 -0800
  • Re: Conference report - resolving security workshop Fri, 23 Feb 1996 14:54:52 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: A brief comparison of email encryption protocols Fri, 23 Feb 1996 12:49:57 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: A brief comparison of email encryption protocols Thu, 22 Feb 1996 16:55:29 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: A brief comparison of email encryption protocols Mon, 19 Feb 1996 18:59:37 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: A brief comparison of email encryption protocols Mon, 19 Feb 1996 11:55:44 -0800 (PST)
  • Updated comparison now on the Web Sun, 18 Feb 1996 14:44:44 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: Weakness in PGP key fingerprints? Fri, 16 Feb 1996 18:06:10 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: Problems with MSP Thu, 15 Feb 1996 15:05:59 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: A brief comparison of email encryption protocols Thu, 15 Feb 1996 11:21:06 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: A brief comparison of email encryption protocols Thu, 15 Feb 1996 09:51:58 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: Problems with MSP Thu, 15 Feb 1996 09:45:47 -0800 (PST)
  • Problems with MSP Wed, 14 Feb 1996 17:40:51 -0800 (PST)
  • A brief comparison of email encryption protocols Wed, 14 Feb 1996 12:49:44 -0800 (PST)
• Rik Drummond
  • Re: MOSS vs. S/MIME vs. PGP/MIME Matrix Fri, 7 Jun 1996 22:46:11 -0500
• Robert Moskowitz
  • Re: Identity of the sender Mon, 29 Apr 1996 09:11:30 -0400
  • Re: MIME is a complex object description, not a transport Sun, 03 Mar 1996 18:46:02 -0500
  • RE: the 8-bit dilemma Wed, 28 Feb 1996 17:28:17 -0500
  • Re: IMAP vs. multipart/signed Wed, 28 Feb 1996 08:56:03 -0500
  • Re: the 8-bit dilemma Wed, 28 Feb 1996 08:30:56 -0500
  • Re: Arriving on Wednesday Tue, 20 Feb 1996 10:49:34 -0500
  • Re: A brief comparison of email encryption protocols Thu, 15 Feb 1996 04:32:45 -0500
• Samuel Pickard
  • RE: Sad situation!!! Fri, 4 Oct 1996 16:05:08 +-100
• Santosh Chokhani
  • Re: Problems with MSP Fri, 16 Feb 1996 08:15:24 -0500
  • Re: Message Security Protocol Fri, 9 Feb 1996 12:26:02 -0500
• Scott Hollenbeck
  • IETF-W3C Interaction? Mon, 4 Nov 1996 10:02:47 PST
  • Re: Draft of workshop notes Fri, 8 Mar 1996 03:45:59 PST
• spock
  • Re[2]: Sad situation!!! Wed, 02 Oct 96 12:00:42 PST
  • Identity of the sender Fri, 26 Apr 96 17:45:58 PST
  • Re[2]: Clarifying controversial criteria Fri, 15 Mar 96 10:15:43 PST
  • Re: A brief comparison of email encryption protocols Fri, 16 Feb 96 15:06:07 PST
• Stefan Monnier
  • Re: carrying certificates Wed, 06 Mar 1996 09:05:16 +0100
• Stephen Kent
  • Re: Sad situation!!! Wed, 2 Oct 1996 07:24:32 -0500
  • PSRG input to IMC meeting Tue, 20 Feb 1996 16:35:23 -0500
  • Re: A brief comparison of email encryption protocols Mon, 19 Feb 1996 13:38:30 -0500
• Subscription manager
  • And so the list begins Mon, 29 Jan 1996 09:36:47 -0800
• Terry Gray
  • Re: Security Problems Tue, 5 Mar 1996 08:14:31 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: IMAP vs. multipart/signed Wed, 28 Feb 1996 07:47:07 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: IMAP vs. multipart/signed Tue, 27 Feb 1996 16:31:04 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: Regarding consensus on Multipart/Signed Sun, 25 Feb 1996 09:04:18 -0800 (PST)
  • Regarding consensus on Multipart/Signed Sat, 24 Feb 1996 15:32:01 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: IMAP vs. multipart/signed Sat, 24 Feb 1996 11:16:15 -0800 (PST)
  • IMAP vs. multipart/signed Fri, 23 Feb 1996 11:03:14 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: Meeting Agenda Tue, 13 Feb 1996 20:27:41 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: Meeting Agenda Mon, 12 Feb 1996 23:02:54 -0800 (PST)
• Terry Ritter
  • Re: Security Problems Thu, 07 Mar 1996 00:52:11 -0600
  • Re: Security Problems Thu, 07 Mar 1996 00:28:58 -0600
  • Re: Security Problems Thu, 07 Mar 1996 00:29:07 -0600
  • Re: Security Problems Wed, 06 Mar 1996 02:14:18 -0600
  • Re: Security Problems Wed, 06 Mar 1996 02:14:06 -0600
  • Re: Security Problems Tue, 05 Mar 1996 16:31:31 -0600
  • Re: Security Problems Tue, 05 Mar 1996 16:31:45 -0600
  • Re: Security Problems Tue, 05 Mar 1996 04:29:22 -0600
  • Re: Security Problems Tue, 05 Mar 1996 04:09:02 -0600
  • Re: Security Problems Tue, 05 Mar 1996 03:34:04 -0600
  • Re: Security Problems Tue, 05 Mar 1996 03:00:27 -0600
  • Re: Security Problems Tue, 05 Mar 1996 02:34:47 -0600
  • Re: Security Problems Mon, 04 Mar 1996 18:48:14 -0600
  • Re: Security Problems Mon, 04 Mar 1996 13:50:24 -0600
  • Re: Security Problems Mon, 04 Mar 1996 13:50:35 -0600
  • Re: Security Problems Mon, 04 Mar 1996 14:22:35 -0600
  • Re: Security Problems Mon, 04 Mar 1996 13:50:24 -0600
  • Re: Security Problems Mon, 04 Mar 1996 13:50:35 -0600
  • Security Problems Mon, 04 Mar 1996 00:26:00 -0600
• Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
  • Re: Sad situation!!! -Reply Thu, 03 Oct 1996 11:13:06 -0400
• VIP@needmorehits.net
  • Search Engine Secrets Sat, 07 Jun 97 02:20:02 EST
• warwick
  • Re: carrying certificates Fri, 8 Mar 1996 19:48:00 -0500
  • Re: features, use, deployment? Sat, 17 Feb 1996 15:28:00 -0500
  • Re: Meeting Agenda Tue, 13 Feb 1996 23:13:00 -0500
• William H. Geiger III
  • Re: Sad situation!!! -Reply -Reply -Reply Fri, 04 Oct 96 00:03:13 -0500
• Yee, Peter
  • Re: [No subject] Fri, 23 Feb 96 09:03:59
  • MSP with MIME technique Internet Draft available Tue, 20 Feb 96 18:50:22

Last message date: Sat 07 Jun 1997 - 03:49:13 PDT
Archived on: Wed Apr 08 1998 - 00:04:18 PDT

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ]