[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: PaceRepeatIdInDocument posted

Bob Wyman wrote:

	It is all this informality and hand-waving around atom:id and
atom:updated that is the source of any trouble with using atom:feed as an
archive format. Given globally unique ids (atom:id) and version tags
(atom:updated) for entries, archiving would be trivial even for "ignoramus

BTW, if it weren't for the atrocious design error of banning recursive feeds, we wouldn't even be having this argument. A feed would always mean "current status", while a series of them would mean "stream".

Robert Sayre