[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Framework for IDN Operations
understand that patent related submissions would include a section stating
IPR considerations. Also I will name the draft under "dnsii" as mentioned
in the statement.
So, the recent new ones are not :-)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul Hoffman / IMC" <phoffman@xxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 6:49 PM
Subject: Re: Framework for IDN Operations
> Whoops! The last message went out without a very important "not" in
> it. It should have read:
> At 6:09 AM -0500 4/2/03, Edmon Chung wrote:
> >Any thoughts or comments will be great.
> Everyone on this list should see Neteka's wording in
> Because of the nature of the Neteka statement, I would *not* want to
> have these documents turned into a standard, and even worse into an
> Informational RFC or Best Current Practice RFC (where the Neteka
> patent statement doesn't even apply and therefore Neteka could nail
> anyone they wanted to under any terms).
> --Paul Hoffman, Director
> --Internet Mail Consortium